{"id":275387,"date":"2025-04-17T10:08:16","date_gmt":"2025-04-17T09:08:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/?p=275387"},"modified":"2025-04-17T10:08:24","modified_gmt":"2025-04-17T09:08:24","slug":"gpd-win-4-2025-vs-gpd-win-mini-2025","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/ar\/gpd-win-4-2025-vs-gpd-win-mini-2025\/","title":{"rendered":"GPD WIN 4 2025 vs GPD WIN Mini 2025 – Which GPD handheld gaming PC is right for you?"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

GPD<\/a> continues its tradition of upgrading its line of handheld gaming PCs, and 2025 welcomes revamped versions of the GPD WIN 4 2025<\/a> and GPD WIN Mini 2025<\/a>. Both of these devices now house the powerful AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 processor, delivering a considerable performance boost over earlier models. Although they use the same core processor, their unique designs, features, and minor performance distinctions make them appealing to different users.<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"GPD<\/a>
GPD WIN 4 2025 vs GPD WIN Mini 2025<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

This article provides a comprehensive comparison of the GPD WIN 4 2025 vs GPD WIN Mini 2025 to help you decide which portable gaming computer is the better choice. We’ll examine design elements like size, weight, displays, and control layouts. Additionally, we\u2019ll explore their hardware specs, benchmark results, eGPU support, and wrap up with final insights to guide your decision.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Form Factor, Display, and Controls<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The most noticeable difference is in their form factor. The GPD WIN 4 2025<\/a> maintains its signature compact, sliding design that evokes classic portable consoles. It measures around 6 x 3.6 x 1.1 inches and weighs 598g. Its 6-inch 1080P H-IPS display slides to reveal a QWERTY keyboard ideal for thumb typing. Control features include dual analog sticks, a D-pad, action buttons, triggers, a fingerprint scanner, and an optical finger mouse.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n
\"GPD<\/a>
GPD WIN 4 2025 Keyboard<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"GPD<\/a>
GPD WIN Mini 2025 Keyboard<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

On the other hand, the GPD WIN Mini 2025<\/a> opts for a clamshell design, akin to a tiny laptop. It\u2019s slightly bigger yet lighter than the WIN 4, coming in at 6.7 x 4.2 x 1 inches and weighing just 555g. Once opened, users are greeted with a 7-inch LTPS touchscreen boasting a 120Hz refresh rate, VRR, and AMD FreeSync. The controls are placed around a central touchpad and compact keyboard.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n
\"GPD<\/a>
GPD WIN 4 2025 Controls<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"GPD<\/a>
GPD WIN Mini 2025 Controls<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

The WIN Mini\u2019s larger screen and refresh rate are standout features, while the WIN 4\u2019s optical mouse brings alternative input flexibility. These differences are worth considering when selecting a compact gaming PC.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Technical Specifications and Thermals<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Internally, the GPD WIN 4 2025<\/a> and GPD WIN Mini 2025 both feature the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 CPU and Radeon 890M GPU. The WIN 4 comes standard with 32GB of LPDDR5x RAM and storage options ranging from 1TB to 4TB using the 2280 NVMe SSD format. The GPD WIN Mini 2025<\/a> offers configurations with 16GB or 32GB LPDDR5x RAM and the same range of NVMe storage. Connectivity is strong on both with Wi-Fi 6E and Bluetooth 5.3, further strengthening their appeal as mobile gaming PC devices.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/td>GPD WIN 4 2025<\/strong><\/td>GPD WIN MINI 2025<\/strong><\/td><\/tr>
CPU<\/strong><\/td>AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370<\/a>, 12 cores, 14 threads up to 5.1GHz<\/td>AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, 12 cores, 14 threads up to 5.1GHz<\/td><\/tr>
GPU<\/strong><\/td>AMD Radeon 890M up to 2,900MHz<\/td>AMD Radeon 890M<\/a> up to 2,900MHz<\/td><\/tr>
RAM<\/strong><\/td>32GB LPDDR5X<\/a><\/td>16GB or 32GB LPDDR5X<\/td><\/tr>
STORAGE<\/strong><\/td>1TB, 2TB or 4TB NVME PCIE 4.0 2280<\/td>2TB or 4TB NVME PCIE 4.0<\/a> 2280<\/td><\/tr>
DISPLAY<\/strong><\/td>6\u2033 H-IPS<\/a> touchscreen, up to 1920×1080 resolution, 40Hz<\/a> & 60Hz<\/a>, 368 PPI<\/td>7″ LTPS<\/a> touchscreen, up to 1920\u00d71080 resolution, 120Hz<\/a>, 16:9, 299 PPI<\/td><\/tr>
COMMUNICATIONS<\/strong><\/td>Wi-Fi 6E
Bluetooth 5.3<\/a><\/td>		Wi-Fi 6E<\/a>
Bluetooth 5.3<\/td><\/tr>
I\/O<\/strong><\/td>1x USB4 Type-C<\/a>
1x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C
1x Oculink<\/a>
1x Micro SD Card Slot
1x 3.5mm headphone port<\/td>		1x USB 4.0 Type-C
1x USB Type-C 3.2 Gen2
1x USB Type-A 3.2 Gen2<\/a>
1x Micro SD Card Slot<\/a>
1x 3.5mm headphone port<\/td><\/tr>
BATTERY<\/strong><\/td>45.62Wh rechargeable battery<\/td>44.24Wh rechargeable battery<\/td><\/tr>
SIZE<\/strong><\/td>6 x 3.6 x 1.1 inches \/
22.0 x 9.2 x 2.8 cm<\/td>		6.7 x 4.2 x 1 inches \/
17.2 x 10.9 x 2.7 cm<\/td><\/tr>
WEIGHT<\/strong><\/td>598g \/
1.31 lbs<\/td>		555g \/
1.2 lbs<\/td><\/tr>
BUY<\/strong><\/td>HERE<\/a><\/td>HERE<\/a><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

In battery life tests under heavy load (Cinebench loop at 28W TDP, full brightness), the WIN 4 lasted about 57 minutes on its 45.62Wh battery. The WIN Mini, with a slightly smaller 44.2Wh battery, lasted slightly longer at 1 hour and 8 minutes. For everyday usage, expect 3 to 6 hours depending on how demanding your tasks are.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n
\"GPD
GPD WIN 4 2025 temperature<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"\"
GPD WIN Mini 2025 temperature<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

During Cinebench thermal and fan tests, both reached 64 dB of noise. The WIN 4 recorded peak temps of 45\u00b0C, whereas the GPD WIN Mini 2025<\/a> climbed to 55\u00b0C. These results matter for gamers looking to invest in a reliable handheld gaming computer for extended sessions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

GPD WIN 4 2025 vs GPD WIN Mini 2025 \u2013 Benchmark Showdown<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

While the GPD WIN 4 2025 vs GPD WIN Mini 2025 include the same chipset, differences in cooling systems, power delivery, and ergonomics can influence real-world performance. Below, we break down their performance in benchmarks and demanding games to help you choose the right device for your needs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Geekbench 6 Single & Multi Core<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

In Geekbench 6<\/a>, the GPD WIN Mini 2025 comes out slightly ahead of the GPD WIN 4 2025<\/a>. It posts 2,900 in single-core and 13,256 in multi-core results, while the WIN 4 scores 2,884 and 12,419 respectively. This minor edge may be beneficial for users who rely on CPU-intensive tasks in their portable gaming PC workflows.<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"GPD<\/a>
GPD WIN 4 2025 vs GPD WIN Mini 2025 Geekbench 6 Benchmark Comparison<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

3DMARK Time Spy, Night Raid & Fire Strike<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

The GPD WIN Mini 2025<\/a> edges out the WIN 4 in the Time Spy test (3,879 vs 3,762), but the WIN 4 performs better in Night Raid (31,627 vs 28,959) and Fire Strike (8,455 vs 7,793). These outcomes show a balance\u2014where the Mini excels in newer DirectX 12 scenarios, the GPD WIN 4 2025 handles older benchmarks better. Both remain excellent compact gaming PC options.<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"GPD<\/a>
GPD WIN 4 2025 vs GPD WIN Mini 2025 3DMARK Benchmark Comparison<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

Cinebench 2024<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

In Cinebench 2024, the WIN 4 slightly outpaces the WIN Mini with scores of 117 single-core and 951 multi-core versus the GPD WIN Mini 2025<\/a> 114 and 849. This makes the WIN 4 a solid mobile gaming PC choice for tasks like rendering or content creation.<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"GPD<\/a>
GPD WIN 4 2025 vs GPD WIN Mini 2025 Cinebench 2024 Benchmark Comparison<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

Forza Horizon 5<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Running Forza Horizon 5 at 1080P 28W, the WIN Mini hits 115 FPS versus the WIN 4\u2019s 112 FPS. At 720P 28W, the gap grows\u2014156 FPS for the Mini vs 149 FPS for the GPD WIN 4 2025<\/a>. This consistent lead might appeal to those who value every frame in their portable gaming computer experience.<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"GPD<\/a>
GPD WIN 4 2025 vs GPD WIN Mini 2025 Forza Horizon 5 Benchmark Comparison<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

Shadow of the Tomb Raider<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Both devices match at 87 FPS in 1080P 28W. However, the GPD WIN Mini 2025<\/a> gets a slight advantage at 720P 28W with 117 FPS compared to the WIN 4’s 115 FPS. Though minor, this could influence a buyer comparing the GPD WIN 4 2025 vs GPD WIN Mini 2025.<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"GPD<\/a>
GPD WIN 4 2025 vs GPD WIN Mini 2025 Shadow of the Tomb Raider Benchmark Comparison<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

Cyberpunk 2077<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

At 1080P 28W, both devices perform almost identically (48.19 FPS for GPD WIN 4 2025<\/a> and 48.05 FPS for the Mini). When dropped to 720P 28W, the Mini gains the lead with 72.61 FPS versus the WIN 4\u2019s 69.8 FPS. For demanding titles, this reinforces the WIN Mini’s credentials as a strong handheld gaming computer.<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"GPD<\/a>
GPD WIN 4 2025 vs GPD WIN Mini 2025 Cyberpunk 2077 Benchmark Comparison<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

Benchmark Summary<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

When looking at the benchmarks of the GPD WIN 4 2025 vs GPD WIN Mini 2025, results are largely neck and neck. The GPD WIN Mini 2025<\/a> performs better in GPU tasks and gaming at lower resolutions, while the GPD WIN 4 2025 performs better in some CPU-heavy workloads.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n
\"Whisker<\/a>
Whisker Squadron on the GPD WIN 4 2025<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"GPD<\/a>
Overthrown on the GPD WIN MINI 2025<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

In daily gaming or work scenarios, these small differences may not be noticeable. With tuning tools like Handheld Companion, you can optimize either device to suit your priorities\u2014be it CPU power for apps or GPU performance for games. Both are flexible, reliable portable gaming PC options.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

eGPU Compatibility<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

One of the key hardware differences is the presence of an OCuLink port on the GPD WIN 4 2025<\/a> in addition to USB 4. OCuLink enables higher bandwidth for eGPU use, resulting in stronger performance\u2014especially when paired with units like the ONEXPLAYER ONEXGPU 2<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"GPD<\/a>
GPD WIN 4 2025 and GPD WIN Mini 2025 Ports<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

The GPD WIN Mini 2025<\/a> lacks an OCuLink port but can still connect to eGPUs through USB 4. While both models support FPS boosts of 90+ with the GPD G1<\/a> eGPU docking station and up to 128 FPS with ONEXGPU 2, the WIN 4\u2019s OCuLink allows for a higher performance ceiling. This makes it an appealing portable gaming computer for those who want future-proof graphics expansion.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Final Thoughts<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The GPD WIN 4 2025 vs GPD WIN Mini 2025 are fairly evenly matched handheld gaming computers powered by AMD\u2019s Ryzen AI 9 HX 370. The decision between them depends on user preferences for design, display, and connectivity.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n
\"PCSX2<\/a>
PCSX2 on the GPD WIN 4 2025<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"GPD<\/a>
PCSX2 on the GPD WIN MINI 2025<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

The GPD WIN 4 2025<\/a> delivers a classic slider-based handheld feel with an optical mouse and OCuLink port, offering top-tier portability and robust eGPU potential with OCuLink connectivity\u2014ideal for users who value power in a compact format and want the most out of their portable gaming computer.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n
\"Indiana<\/a>
Indiana Jones and the Great Circle on the GPD WIN 4 2025<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"GPD<\/a>
Palworld on the GPD WIN MINI 2025<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Meanwhile, the GPD WIN Mini 2025<\/a> gives users a clamshell-style mini-laptop with a 7-inch 120Hz display and integrated touchpad, excelling in both gaming and multitasking. Its lightweight build and high refresh screen make it a standout compact gaming PC, despite lacking OCuLink.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n
BUY THE GPD WIN 4 2025 HERE<\/a><\/div>\n\n\n\n
BUY THE GPD WIN MINI 2025 HERE<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

You can read our in-depth reviews on this blog, check out the GPD WIN 4 2025 review here<\/a>, and the GPD WIN Mini 2025 review here<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Share Your Thoughts<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Which GPD<\/a> handheld refresh has won you over? Are you leaning toward the slider-style GPD WIN 4 2025<\/a> or the clamshell GPD WIN Mini 2025<\/a>? Is the OCuLink port a deciding factor, or do you prioritize the WIN Mini\u2019s 120Hz screen? Let us know your pick and thoughts on the GPD WIN 4 2025 vs GPD WIN Mini 2025 in the comments below!<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n