{"id":347932,"date":"2025-09-03T13:49:34","date_gmt":"2025-09-03T12:49:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/gpd-micropc-2-vs-gpd-micropc\/"},"modified":"2025-11-06T15:57:10","modified_gmt":"2025-11-06T15:57:10","slug":"gpd-micropc-2-vs-gpd-micropc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/en-au\/gpd-micropc-2-vs-gpd-micropc\/","title":{"rendered":"A Generational Leap: GPD MicroPC 2 vs GPD MicroPC"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Back in 2019, the original GPD<\/a> MicroPC carved out a unique space in the tech world. It was a purpose-built tool, a cult classic beloved by IT professionals, network engineers, and system administrators for its rugged build and unparalleled connectivity in a pocket-sized form. Now, in the fast-paced tech landscape of 2025, its long-awaited successor has arrived. For loyal fans and new buyers alike, the question is simple: what has changed, and is it a worthy upgrade? This is the definitive GPD MicroPC 2<\/a> vs GPD MicroPC comparison. \u00a0<\/p>\n\n

A Tale of Two Designs<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n

Setting the two mini laptops<\/a> side-by-side, the shared DNA is clear, but the evolution is immediate. The original’s functional 6-inch, 720p (non-touchscreen) screen is replaced by a larger, brighter, and far sharper 7-inch, 1080p touchscreen on the GPD MicroPC 2<\/a>. The most significant physical change is the new 180-degree hinge, which allows the screen to fold back, transforming the device into a tablet\u2014a feature entirely absent on the 2019 model. <\/p>\n

\n
\"The<\/a>
The GPD MicroPC 1 & 2<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n

While both are paragons of compact laptops, the newer model modernises the I\/O, upgrading to faster USB 3.2 Gen2 standards and a blistering 2.5Gbps Ethernet port, a substantial improvement over the original’s 1Gbps port. These design changes make the new model more versatile than its predecessor, which was one of the most iconic small-sized laptops of its time.<\/p>\n\n

GPD MicroPC 2 vs GPD MicroPC Technical Specifications<\/h2>\n\n
<\/th>GPD MICROPC (2019)<\/th>GPD MICROPC 2 (2025)<\/th><\/tr><\/thead>
DISPLAY<\/strong><\/td>6″ H-IPS 720P (1280×720), 60Hz, 16:9<\/td>7″ LTPS<\/a> 1080P (1920×1080), 60Hz, 16:9, 314 PPI, 500 nits<\/td><\/tr>
CPU<\/strong><\/td>Intel Celeron N4120<\/a> Processor<\/td>Intel Processor N250<\/a>, 4 Cores \/ 4 Threads, 3.8 GHz, 6W – 15WIntel Processor N300<\/a> 8 Cores \/ 8 Threads, 3.8 GHz, 7W<\/td><\/tr>
GPU<\/strong><\/td>Integrated Intel HD Graphics 600<\/a><\/td>Integrated Intel UHD Graphics<\/a>, 1.25GHz, 32 Execution Units<\/td><\/tr>
RAM<\/strong><\/td>8GB LPDDR4<\/a><\/td>16GB LPDDR5<\/a><\/td><\/tr>
STORAGE<\/strong><\/td>256GB,\u00a0512GB,\u00a01TB M.2 2242 SSD<\/td>512GB\/1TB\/2TB\/4TB M.2 2280 SSD<\/a><\/td><\/tr>
COMMUNICATIONS<\/strong><\/td>1x RJ45 Ethernet Port<\/a> (1Gbps)Wi-Fi 5Bluetooth 4.2<\/td>1x RJ45 Ethernet Port<\/a> (2.5Gbps)Wi-Fi 6<\/a> (up to 2402 Mbps)Bluetooth 5.2<\/a> (supports up to 7 active devices)<\/td><\/tr>
I\/O<\/strong><\/td>1x RS-2321x USB Type-C 3.0<\/a>3x USB Type-A 3.0<\/a>1x HDMI<\/a> 2.0 Type A<\/td>2x USB Type-C 3.2 Gen2 (Full-Function)2x USB-A 3.2 Gen21x HDMI 2.1<\/a> (TMDS Protocol, supports 4K@60Hz)2x DisplayPort 1.4 (via USB-C, supports 4K@60Hz)<\/td><\/tr>
BATTERY<\/strong><\/td>47.12Wh<\/td>27.5WhSupports Battery Bypass<\/td><\/tr>
DIMENSIONS<\/strong><\/td>6.02 x 4.44 x 0.92 inches (15.3 x 11.3 x 2.35 cm)<\/td>6.73 x 4.33 x 0.91 inches (17.1 x 11.0 x 2.3 cm)<\/td><\/tr>
WEIGHT<\/strong><\/td>440 grams (0.97 lbs)<\/td>500 grams (1.10 lbs)<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n

The Performance Chasm<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n

While the design changes are impressive, the gulf in performance is staggering. The original’s Intel<\/a> Celeron N4120 was capable for its era, but the new Intel N-series processors in the GPD MicroPC 2<\/a> represent a monumental leap forward. To illustrate this, we ran a series of benchmarks comparing the original model to both the new N250 and N300 CPU variants.<\/p>\n\n

BENCHMARK<\/td>GPD MICROPC (2019)<\/td>GPD MICROPC 2 (N250)<\/td>GPD MICROPC 2 (N300)<\/td><\/tr><\/thead>
PASSMARK<\/strong><\/td>373.6<\/td>2113.1<\/td>2280.9<\/td><\/tr>
PCMARK<\/strong><\/td>1684<\/td>3278<\/td>3658<\/td><\/tr>
3DMARK TIME SPY<\/strong><\/td>131<\/td>672<\/td>N\/A<\/td><\/tr>
CINEBENCH R23 <\/strong>(SINGLE-CORE\/MULTI-CORE)<\/strong><\/td>400 \/ 1395<\/td>921 \/ 3049<\/td>936 \/ 3660<\/td><\/tr>
CINEBENCH 2024<\/strong>(SINGLE-CORE\/MULTI-CORE)<\/strong><\/td>N\/A<\/td>59 \/ 191<\/td>61 \/ 237<\/td><\/tr>
GEEKBENCH 6<\/strong>(SINGLE-CORE\/MULTI-CORE)<\/strong><\/td>343 \/ 1060<\/td>1170 \/ 3186<\/td>1288 \/ 4256<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n
\n
\"GPD<\/a>
GPD MicroPC 2 N250 vs N300 benchmarks<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n

Looking at the GPD MicroPC 2<\/a> vs GPD MicroPC data, the numbers are stark. Both new models show a 5-6x increase in overall system performance in PassMark and double the efficiency in everyday tasks according to PCMark. The raw CPU gains in benchmarks like Geekbench 6 are consistently around 3x or more. When comparing the two new models, the N300 offers a clear advantage, particularly in multi-core performance where it shows a 20-33% lead over the N250, making it the most powerful option by a significant margin.<\/p>\n\n

A Note on Power and Longevity<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n

Another crucial factor in any portable device is battery life. Under a continuous, full-power, full brightness load running Cinebench R23 on all three devices, the original GPD MicroPC from 2019 provided around 2 hours of use. The new models post similar, though slightly shorter, times despite their immense performance advantage: the N250 GPD MicroPC 2<\/a> lasted for 1 hour and 42 minutes, while the N300 model ran for 1 hour and 47 minutes. <\/p>\n

\n
\"GPD<\/a>
GPD MicroPC 2 in tablet mode<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n

This minor decrease in longevity under maximum load is a very reasonable trade-off for the exponential leap in processing power. For more realistic, average daily usage involving tasks like web browsing, document editing, and terminal work, all three models offer a comparable expectation of around 4 to 6 hours, ensuring they can get you through a significant part of your workday before needing to find a charger.<\/p>\n\n

Real-World Impact and New Possibilities<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n

These benchmark figures translate into a tangible difference in user experience. Where the original could feel sluggish even while navigating Windows menus, both GPD MicroPC 2<\/a> models feel responsive and snappy. This performance boost unlocks new potential, elevating the device from a niche diagnostic tool to a genuinely viable primary computer. <\/p>\n

\n
\"The<\/a>
The touchscreen is a welcome addition<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n

For daily tasks, the N250 is more than sufficient, but for professionals needing to run more demanding software, light virtualisation, or heavy multi-tasking, the N300’s superior multi-core power makes it one of the most capable laptops for business in this ultra-compact form factor. This newfound power also makes both models intriguing laptops for students in STEM fields who need a portable device that can run specialised software.<\/p>\n\n

The One Big Compromise<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n

No comparison would be honest without addressing the most controversial change: the removal of the native RS-232<\/a> serial port. For a dedicated group of industrial technicians and network engineers, this port was the original’s killer feature. Its omission on the GPD MicroPC 2<\/a> is a clear trade-off, prioritising modern features like the 2-in-1 design over a legacy connection. <\/p>\n

\n
\"GPD<\/a>
GPD MicroPC 1 and 2 with GPD Pocket 4<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n

While workarounds like high-quality USB-to-Serial adapters exist, those who require a native port may need to stick with the original or consider alternatives such as the GPD Pocket 4<\/a> which has a modular port system with RS-232 module. For most users, however, even those who used the port occasionally, the immense benefits in every other category will likely outweigh this loss. This makes the GPD MicroPC 2<\/a> vs GPD MicroPC decision a matter of specific professional need.<\/p>\n\n

The Verdict<\/h2>\n\n

For almost every user, the GPD MicroPC 2 is a monumental and worthy upgrade. The leap in performance is one of the largest generational jumps we\u2019ve seen, the screen is vastly superior, and the 2-in-1 tablet functionality adds a layer of versatility the original couldn’t dream of. It takes the spirit of the original and modernises it for the demands of 2025, competing admirably with other ultra-portable notebooks. While the original remains a beloved classic\u2014and a necessity for those who depend on its serial port\u2014the GPD MicroPC 2<\/a> is undoubtedly the future.<\/p>\n\n

If you would like to read more, check out our in-depth GPD MicroPC 2 review here<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n

\n
BUY THE GPD MICROPC 2 HERE<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n

We would love to hear from owners of the original MicroPC! What are your thoughts on this upgrade? For those considering a new purchase, does this generational leap convince you? Please share your questions and feedback in the comments section below.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Our GPD MicroPC 2 vs GPD MicroPC comparison is here! See the massive performance gains with full benchmarks for the N250 and N300 models. Is it worth upgrading?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":859,"featured_media":347933,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6809],"tags":[6464,7007,7002],"class_list":{"0":"post-347932","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-editorials","8":"tag-gpd","9":"tag-micropc","10":"tag-micropc-2"},"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/en-au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/347932","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/en-au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/en-au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/en-au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/859"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/en-au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=347932"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/en-au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/347932\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":348155,"href":"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/en-au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/347932\/revisions\/348155"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/en-au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/347933"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/en-au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=347932"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/en-au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=347932"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/en-au\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=347932"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}