{"id":73933,"date":"2022-05-26T17:00:01","date_gmt":"2022-05-26T16:00:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/onexplayer-amd-mini-5800u-arvostelu-ja-vertailu-videon-kanssa\/"},"modified":"2023-07-13T11:41:49","modified_gmt":"2023-07-13T10:41:49","slug":"onexplayer-amd-mini-5800u-arvostelu-ja-vertailu-videon-kanssa","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/fi\/onexplayer-amd-mini-5800u-arvostelu-ja-vertailu-videon-kanssa\/","title":{"rendered":"ONEXPLAYER AMD &amp; MINI 5800U arvostelu ja vertailu videon kanssa"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Arvostelussamme tarkastelemme <a href=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/brand\/onexplayer\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">ONEXPLAYERin<\/a> kahta upouutta AMD 5800U -mallia, <a href=\"https:\/\/droix.eu\/fi\/product\/onexplayer-amd\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">ONEXPLAYER AMD<\/a>:t\u00e4 ja <a href=\"https:\/\/droix.eu\/fi\/product\/onexplayer-mini\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">ONEXPLAYER Mini\u00e4<\/a>. Puramme niiden laatikon, tutustumme niiden ominaisuuksiin ja suoritamme joitakin j\u00e4rjestelm\u00e4n ja pelien vertailuarvoja, mink\u00e4 j\u00e4lkeen testaamme pelej\u00e4 ja emulaattoreita.<\/p>\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">ONEXPLAYER AMD &amp; MINI 5800U arvosteluvideo<\/h2>\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-embed is-type-video is-provider-youtube wp-block-embed-youtube wp-embed-aspect-16-9 wp-has-aspect-ratio\"><div class=\"wp-block-embed__wrapper\">\n<iframe loading=\"lazy\" title=\"ONEXPLAYER AMD and Mini Ryzen 5800U review and comparison with other Windows gaming handhelds\" width=\"1170\" height=\"658\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/r6OyVd9zpaA?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share\" referrerpolicy=\"strict-origin-when-cross-origin\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe>\n<\/div><\/figure>\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-onexplayer-amd-mini-5800u-unboxing\">ONEXPLAYER AMD &amp; MINI 5800U - pakkauksen purkaminen<\/h2>\n\n<p>Aloitetaan ONEXPLAYER AMD &amp; MINI 5800U -katsaus purkamalla <a href=\"https:\/\/droix.eu\/fi\/product\/onexplayer-mini\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">ONEXPLAYER Minin<\/a> laatikko. Sis\u00e4ll\u00e4 on ONEXPLAYER Mini -k\u00e4sikonsolin peli-PC, jota tarkastelemme tarkemmin hetken kuluttua.  <\/p>\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-large is-resized\"><a href=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-5800U-Unboxed.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-5800U-Unboxed-1024x576.jpg\" alt=\"ONEXPLAYER Mini 5800U Unboxed-pakkauksen purkaminen\" class=\"wp-image-21406\" width=\"768\" height=\"432\" srcset=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-5800U-Unboxed-1024x576.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-5800U-Unboxed-300x169.jpg 300w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-5800U-Unboxed-768x432.jpg 768w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-5800U-Unboxed-1536x864.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-5800U-Unboxed-450x253.jpg 450w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-5800U-Unboxed-780x439.jpg 780w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-5800U-Unboxed-1600x900.jpg 1600w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-5800U-Unboxed.jpg 1920w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 768px) 100vw, 768px\" \/><\/a><figcaption>ONEXPLAYER Mini 5800U Unboxed-pakkauksen purkaminen<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<p>Seuraavaksi meill\u00e4 on pikaopas. Oikeudenmukaisuuden nimiss\u00e4 siin\u00e4 ei ole paljoa, siin\u00e4 on hieman englanninkielist\u00e4 teksti\u00e4, mutta sit\u00e4 ei oikeastaan tarvita. Ensimm\u00e4isen laatikon sis\u00e4ll\u00e4 on USB-virtal\u00e4hde. Toimitamme oikean sovittimen maasi mukaan tilauksen yhteydess\u00e4. Viimeisen\u00e4 muttei v\u00e4h\u00e4isimp\u00e4n\u00e4 on USB Type-C -latauskaapeli.<\/p>\n\n<p>Ja siirry suurempaan <a href=\"https:\/\/droix.eu\/fi\/product\/onexplayer-amd\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">ONEXPLAYER AMD<\/a> -malliin. Sis\u00e4ll\u00e4 on ONEXPLAYER AMD -pelik\u00e4mmentietokone, jota my\u00f6s tarkastelemme l\u00e4hiaikoina l\u00e4hemmin.  <\/p>\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-large is-resized\"><a href=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-AMD-5800U-Unboxed-1024x576.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-AMD-5800U-Unboxed-1024x576.jpg\" alt=\"ONEXPLAYER AMD 5800U Unboxed (ilman laatikkoa)\" class=\"wp-image-21411\" width=\"768\" height=\"432\" srcset=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-AMD-5800U-Unboxed-1024x576.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-AMD-5800U-Unboxed-300x169.jpg 300w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-AMD-5800U-Unboxed-768x432.jpg 768w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-AMD-5800U-Unboxed-1536x864.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-AMD-5800U-Unboxed-450x253.jpg 450w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-AMD-5800U-Unboxed-780x439.jpg 780w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-AMD-5800U-Unboxed-1600x900.jpg 1600w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-AMD-5800U-Unboxed.jpg 1920w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 768px) 100vw, 768px\" \/><\/a><figcaption>ONEXPLAYER AMD 5800U Unboxed (ilman laatikkoa)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<p>Mukana on pikaopas. T\u00e4ss\u00e4 on hieman enemm\u00e4n tietoa ja enemm\u00e4n englanninkielist\u00e4 teksti\u00e4. Pakkauksen sis\u00e4ll\u00e4 on USB-virtal\u00e4hde ja USB Type-C -latauskaapeli. Kuten ennenkin, toimitamme mukana maasi oikean virtasovittimen.<\/p>\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-overview-of-the-onexplayer-amd-mini-5800u\">Yleiskatsaus ONEXPLAYER AMD &amp; MINI 5800U -n\u00e4yt\u00f6nohjaimiin<\/h2>\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/droix.eu\/fi\/product\/onexplayer-amd\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">ONEXPLAYER AMD<\/a>:n mitat ovat 11,3 x 5,1 x 0,9 tuumaa. <a href=\"https:\/\/droix.eu\/fi\/product\/onexplayer-mini\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">ONEXPLAYER Minin<\/a> mitat ovat 10,23 x 4,1 x 0,9 tuumaa.<\/p>\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-large is-resized\"><a href=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-5800U-Dimensions.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-5800U-Dimensions-1024x576.jpg\" alt=\"ONEXPLAYER Mini 5800U Mitat\" class=\"wp-image-21416\" width=\"768\" height=\"432\" srcset=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-5800U-Dimensions-1024x576.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-5800U-Dimensions-300x169.jpg 300w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-5800U-Dimensions-768x432.jpg 768w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-5800U-Dimensions-1536x864.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-5800U-Dimensions-450x253.jpg 450w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-5800U-Dimensions-780x439.jpg 780w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-5800U-Dimensions-1600x900.jpg 1600w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-5800U-Dimensions.jpg 1920w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 768px) 100vw, 768px\" \/><\/a><figcaption>ONEXPLAYER Mini 5800U Mitat<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<p>AMD:n n\u00e4ytt\u00f6 on 8,4 tuumaa ja sen resoluutio on 2560&#215;1600. Mini-n\u00e4yt\u00f6n koko on 7 tuumaa ja resoluutio 1920&#215;1200. T\u00e4m\u00e4 on syyt\u00e4 ottaa huomioon, jos aiot pelata pelej\u00e4 natiiviresoluutiolla. Mit\u00e4 suurempi resoluutio, sit\u00e4 enemm\u00e4n prosessointitehoa kuluu.<\/p>\n\n<p>Molemmat laitteet n\u00e4ytt\u00e4v\u00e4t p\u00e4\u00e4piirteitt\u00e4in samalta edest\u00e4. K\u00e4yt\u00f6ss\u00e4si on kaksi analogista tikkua, D-pad ja pelipainikkeet.<\/p>\n\n<p>Oikealla alhaalla on eroa yhden painikkeen kanssa. ONEXPLAYER AMD:ss\u00e4 on Turbo-painike, jolla voit helposti vaihtaa TDP:t\u00e4. Miniss\u00e4 se on korvattu Night Mode -toiminnolla, joka v\u00e4hent\u00e4\u00e4 tuulettimen nopeutta ja melua. Voit muuttaa TDP-arvoa <a href=\"https:\/\/ryzencontroller.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Ryzen Controller<\/a> -ohjelmiston kaltaisella ohjelmistolla, ja suosittelemme tekem\u00e4\u00e4n sen t\u00e4ll\u00e4 tavalla.<\/p>\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-large is-resized\"><a href=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Top-view.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Top-view-1024x576.jpg\" alt=\"ONEXPLAYER 5800U Ylh&#xE4;&#xE4;lt&#xE4; katsottuna\" class=\"wp-image-21421\" width=\"768\" height=\"432\" srcset=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Top-view-1024x576.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Top-view-300x169.jpg 300w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Top-view-768x432.jpg 768w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Top-view-1536x864.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Top-view-450x253.jpg 450w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Top-view-780x439.jpg 780w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Top-view-1600x900.jpg 1600w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Top-view.jpg 1920w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 768px) 100vw, 768px\" \/><\/a><figcaption>ONEXPLAYER 5800U Ylh\u00e4\u00e4lt\u00e4 katsottuna<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<p>Molemmissa malleissa on tavalliset vasemman ja oikean olkap\u00e4\u00e4n ja liipaisimen painikkeet. AMD-mallissa on kaksi USB Type-C-porttia yl\u00e4osassa, Miniss\u00e4 yksi yl\u00e4osassa ja yksi laitteen alaosassa. Molemmissa on USB 3 -portti yl\u00e4osassa.<\/p>\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"576\" src=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Back-View-1024x576.jpg\" alt=\"ONEXPLAYER 5800U Takakuva\" class=\"wp-image-21426\" srcset=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Back-View-1024x576.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Back-View-300x169.jpg 300w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Back-View-768x432.jpg 768w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Back-View-1536x864.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Back-View-450x253.jpg 450w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Back-View-780x439.jpg 780w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Back-View-1600x900.jpg 1600w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Back-View.jpg 1920w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><figcaption>ONEXPLAYER 5800U Takakuva<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n<p>ONEXPLAYER AMD:ss\u00e4 on jalusta, jolla laite pysyy pystyss\u00e4 ty\u00f6p\u00f6yd\u00e4ll\u00e4si. Laitteessa on virtan\u00e4pp\u00e4in, \u00e4\u00e4nenvoimakkuusn\u00e4pp\u00e4imet yl\u00f6s ja alas sek\u00e4 oma \u00e4\u00e4nenvoimakkuuden mykistysn\u00e4pp\u00e4in.<\/p>\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-onexplayer-amd-mini-5800u-technical-specifications\">ONEXPLAYER AMD &amp; MINI 5800U Tekniset tiedot<\/h2>\n\n<p>Jatkamme ONEXPLAYER AMD &amp; MINI 5800U -katsausta ja tarkastelemme teknisi\u00e4 tietoja. Molemmissa malleissa on periaatteessa sama laitteisto, mutta n\u00e4yt\u00f6n ja kotelon koko on erilainen.<\/p>\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table><tbody><tr><td><\/td><td><strong>ONEXPLAYER AMD 5800U<\/strong><\/td><td><strong>ONEXPLAYER Mini 5800U<\/strong><\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>CPU<\/strong><\/td><td>AMD Ryzen 7 5800U, Zen 3, 8 ydint\u00e4 16 s\u00e4iett\u00e4<br\/>1,90 GHz:n perustaajuus, 4,4 GHz:n enimm\u00e4isturbotaajuus<br\/>Oletusarvo 25W TDP<\/td><td>AMD Ryzen 7 5800U, Zen 3, 8 ydint\u00e4 16 s\u00e4iett\u00e4<br\/>1,90 GHz:n perustaajuus, 4,4 GHz:n enimm\u00e4isturbotaajuus<br\/>Oletusarvo 25W TDP<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>GPU<\/strong><\/td><td>AMD Radeon Graphics, 8 ydint\u00e4 @ 2000 MHz<\/td><td>AMD Radeon Graphics, 8 ydint\u00e4 @ 2000 MHz<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>RAM<\/strong><\/td><td>16GB LPDDR4x 4,266MHz kaksikanavainen muisti<\/td><td>16GB LPDDR4x 4,266MHz kaksikanavainen muisti<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>VARASTOINTI<\/strong><\/td><td>1 tai 2TB M.2 2280 (NVMe) tallennustila<br\/>PCle 3.0 x4<\/td><td>1 tai 2TB M.2 2280 (NVMe) tallennustila<br\/>PCle 3.0 x4<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>VIESTINT\u00c4<\/strong><\/td><td>Wi-Fi 6<br\/>Bluetooth 5.0<\/td><td>Wi-Fi 6<br\/>Bluetooth 5.0<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>AKKU<\/strong><\/td><td>15 300 mAh akku<br\/>5 tuntia 50 minuuttia tyhj\u00e4k\u00e4ynnill\u00e4<br\/>1 tunti 48 t\u00e4ydell\u00e4 kuormalla<\/td><td>12 600 mAh akku<br\/>6 tuntia 10 minuuttia tyhj\u00e4k\u00e4ynnill\u00e4<br\/>1 tunti 57 t\u00e4ydell\u00e4 kuormalla<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>TUULETTIMEN MELU &amp; L\u00c4MP\u00d6TILA<\/strong><\/td><td>66dB t\u00e4ydell\u00e4 kuormituksella<br\/>46\u00b0C \/ 114.8\u00b0F korkein l\u00e4mp\u00f6tila<\/td><td>66dB t\u00e4ydell\u00e4 kuormituksella<br\/>41\u00b0C \/ 105.8\u00b0F korkein l\u00e4mp\u00f6tila<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><figcaption>ONEXPLAYER AMD &amp; MINI 5800U Tekniset tiedot<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n<p>Tuulettimen melu ja l\u00e4mp\u00f6tila mitattiin, kun Cinebenchi\u00e4 ajettiin 10 minuutin ajan.<\/p>\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-system-benchmarks\">J\u00e4rjestelm\u00e4n vertailuarvot<\/h2>\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-passmark\">PassMark<\/h3>\n\n<p>Aloitamme j\u00e4rjestelm\u00e4n vertailuarvot PassMarkilla. K\u00e4yt\u00e4mme sit\u00e4 4K-resoluutiolla ja 20 W:n TDP:ll\u00e4, jotta se pysyisi linjassa aiempien k\u00e4mmentestiemme kanssa. PassMark suorittaa useita testej\u00e4 suorittimelle, n\u00e4yt\u00f6nohjaimelle, RAM-muistille ja tallennustilalle, jotta ne saavuttaisivat maksimisuorituskykyns\u00e4.<\/p>\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-large is-resized\"><a href=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-PassMark-Results.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-PassMark-Results-1024x576.jpg\" alt=\"ONEXPLAYER 5800U PassMark-tulokset\" class=\"wp-image-21431\" width=\"768\" height=\"432\" srcset=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-PassMark-Results-1024x576.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-PassMark-Results-300x169.jpg 300w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-PassMark-Results-768x432.jpg 768w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-PassMark-Results-1536x864.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-PassMark-Results-450x253.jpg 450w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-PassMark-Results-780x439.jpg 780w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-PassMark-Results-1600x900.jpg 1600w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-PassMark-Results.jpg 1920w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 768px) 100vw, 768px\" \/><\/a><figcaption>ONEXPLAYER 5800U PassMark-tulokset<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/droix.eu\/fi\/product\/onexplayer-amd\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">ONEXPLAYER AMD<\/a> -k\u00e4sikonsolin pistem\u00e4\u00e4r\u00e4 on 4 734 ja <a href=\"https:\/\/droix.eu\/fi\/product\/onexplayer-mini\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">ONEXPLAYER Mini<\/a> -k\u00e4sikonsolin pistem\u00e4\u00e4r\u00e4 on 5 073. Tuloksissa on huomattava ero, ja on mielenkiintoista n\u00e4hd\u00e4, jatkuuko se testien aikana.<\/p>\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-pcmark\">PCMark<\/h3>\n\n<p>Seuraava testimme on PCMark ja ajamme 4K:lla 20W TDP:ll\u00e4. PCMark suorittaa sarjan testej\u00e4, jotka perustuvat tietokoneen p\u00e4ivitt\u00e4iseen k\u00e4ytt\u00f6\u00f6n. N\u00e4ihin teht\u00e4viin kuuluvat muun muassa verkkoselaaminen, ikkunoiden k\u00e4ynnistymisen nopeus, ohjelmistojen lataaminen, suurten toimistodokumenttien ty\u00f6st\u00e4minen ja paljon muuta.<\/p>\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-large is-resized\"><a href=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-PCMark-Results.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-PCMark-Results-1024x576.jpg\" alt=\"ONEXPLAYER 5800U PCMark-tulokset\" class=\"wp-image-21436\" width=\"768\" height=\"432\" srcset=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-PCMark-Results-1024x576.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-PCMark-Results-300x169.jpg 300w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-PCMark-Results-768x432.jpg 768w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-PCMark-Results-1536x864.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-PCMark-Results-450x253.jpg 450w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-PCMark-Results-780x439.jpg 780w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-PCMark-Results-1600x900.jpg 1600w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-PCMark-Results.jpg 1920w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 768px) 100vw, 768px\" \/><\/a><figcaption>ONEXPLAYER 5800U PCMark-tulokset<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<p>ONEXPLAYER AMD:n kanssa saamme tulokseksi 5,641. Ja ONEXPLAYER Minin kanssa saamme pisteet 5,687. Molemmat pisteet ovat melko samanlaiset, mik\u00e4 on hyv\u00e4 n\u00e4hd\u00e4.<\/p>\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-3dmark\">3DMark<\/h3>\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/benchmarks.ul.com\/3dmark\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">3DMark<\/a> suorittaa useita testej\u00e4 suorittimella ja n\u00e4yt\u00f6nohjaimella n\u00e4hd\u00e4kseen, miten hyvin se suoriutuu grafiikkaan liittyvist\u00e4 teht\u00e4vist\u00e4. N\u00e4ihin kuuluvat kuvank\u00e4sittely ja tietenkin pelaaminen. Suoritamme testit 4K-resoluutiolla ja 11, 20 ja 35 W:n TDP-arvoilla, jotta n\u00e4emme, miten suorituskyky muuttuu eri TDP-arvoilla.<\/p>\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-large is-resized\"><a href=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-3DMark-results.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-3DMark-results-1024x576.jpg\" alt=\"ONEXPLAYER 5800U 3DMark tulokset\" class=\"wp-image-21441\" width=\"768\" height=\"432\" srcset=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-3DMark-results-1024x576.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-3DMark-results-300x169.jpg 300w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-3DMark-results-768x432.jpg 768w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-3DMark-results-1536x864.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-3DMark-results-450x253.jpg 450w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-3DMark-results-780x439.jpg 780w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-3DMark-results-1600x900.jpg 1600w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-3DMark-results.jpg 1920w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 768px) 100vw, 768px\" \/><\/a><figcaption>ONEXPLAYER 5800U 3DMark tulokset<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<p>ONEXPLAYER AMD -pelikonsolin tulokset ovat 952, 1304 ja 1460 pistett\u00e4 11, 20 ja 35 W:n TDP-arvoilla. ONEXPLAYER Mini -k\u00e4sikonsolin pisteet ovat 1,075, 1,366 ja 1,465 kaikissa kolmessa TDP:ss\u00e4.  <\/p>\n\n<p>Erot ovat 11 ja 20 W:n pistem\u00e4\u00e4riss\u00e4, ja 35 W:n pistem\u00e4\u00e4r\u00e4t ovat p\u00e4\u00e4osin samat.<\/p>\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-large is-resized\"><a href=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-and-AMD-5800U-3D-Mark.png\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-and-AMD-5800U-3D-Mark-1024x576.png\" alt=\"ONEXPLAYER Mini ja AMD 5800U 3D Merkki\" class=\"wp-image-21381\" width=\"768\" height=\"432\" srcset=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-and-AMD-5800U-3D-Mark-1024x576.png 1024w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-and-AMD-5800U-3D-Mark-300x169.png 300w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-and-AMD-5800U-3D-Mark-768x432.png 768w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-and-AMD-5800U-3D-Mark-1536x864.png 1536w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-and-AMD-5800U-3D-Mark-450x253.png 450w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-and-AMD-5800U-3D-Mark-780x439.png 780w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-and-AMD-5800U-3D-Mark-1600x900.png 1600w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-and-AMD-5800U-3D-Mark.png 1920w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 768px) 100vw, 768px\" \/><\/a><figcaption>3D Mark -vertailuvertailu<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<p id=\"h-putting-this-into-a-more-visual-form-we-can-see-that-the-amd-5800u-and-5825u-based-devices-have-varying-lower-tdp-scores-but-at-35w-they-are-scoring-in-the-same-ballpark\">Kun t\u00e4m\u00e4 muutetaan visuaalisempaan muotoon, voimme n\u00e4hd\u00e4, ett\u00e4 AMD 5800U- ja 5825U-pohjaisilla laitteilla on vaihtelevasti alhaisemmat TDP-arvot, mutta 35 W:n teholla ne ovat samoissa lukemissa.<\/p>\n\n<p>Suorituskyky on kasvanut mukavasti verrattuna vanhemman sukupolven AMD:hen perustuviin laitteisiin: 4500U-malleissa 30 % ja 4800U-malleissa 8 %.<\/p>\n\n<p>3DMarkin kuningas on kuitenkin edelleen ONEXPLAYER Mini Intel 1195G7 -malli, jonka pistem\u00e4\u00e4r\u00e4 on erinomainen 1 982.<\/p>\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-gaming-benchmarks\">Pelien vertailuarvot<\/h2>\n\n<p>Jatkamme ONEXPLAYER AMD &amp; MINI 5800U -arvostelua pelien vertailuarvoilla. Jotta voimme testata ja vertailla kaikkia k\u00e4sikonsoleita tasapuolisesti, suoritamme pelien vertailuarvot 1280&#215;800-resoluutiolla riippumatta k\u00e4sikonsolin resoluutiosta. AMD:n natiiviresoluutio on 2560&#215;1900 ja Minin 1920&#215;1200, mik\u00e4 tarkoittaa, ett\u00e4 pelien render\u00f6inti t\u00e4ll\u00e4 resoluutiolla vaatii enemm\u00e4n prosessointitehoa, emmek\u00e4 voi tehd\u00e4 suorituskykyvertailua.<\/p>\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-forza-horizon-5\">Forza Horizon 5<\/h3>\n\n<p>Aloitamme pelien vertailuanalyysit Forza Horizon 5:ll\u00e4, joka toimii 1280&#215;800-n\u00e4yt\u00f6ll\u00e4 ja eritt\u00e4in alhaisilla grafiikka-asetuksilla. Testaamme my\u00f6s 11, 20 ja 35 W:n TDP-arvoilla n\u00e4hd\u00e4ksemme erot suorituskyvyss\u00e4.<\/p>\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-large is-resized\"><a href=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Forza-Horizon-5-results.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Forza-Horizon-5-results-1024x576.jpg\" alt=\"ONEXPLAYER 5800U Forza Horizon 5 tulokset\" class=\"wp-image-21446\" width=\"768\" height=\"432\" srcset=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Forza-Horizon-5-results-1024x576.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Forza-Horizon-5-results-300x169.jpg 300w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Forza-Horizon-5-results-768x432.jpg 768w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Forza-Horizon-5-results-1536x864.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Forza-Horizon-5-results-450x253.jpg 450w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Forza-Horizon-5-results-780x439.jpg 780w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Forza-Horizon-5-results-1600x900.jpg 1600w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Forza-Horizon-5-results.jpg 1920w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 768px) 100vw, 768px\" \/><\/a><figcaption>ONEXPLAYER 5800U Forza Horizon 5 tulokset<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/droix.eu\/fi\/product\/onexplayer-amd\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">ONEXPLAYER AMD<\/a>:n tulokset ovat 53, 77 ja 87 kuvaa sekunnissa kolmella TDP:ll\u00e4. <a href=\"https:\/\/droix.eu\/fi\/product\/onexplayer-mini\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">ONEXPLAYER Minin<\/a> tulokset ovat 51, 78 ja 88 kuvaa sekunnissa. N\u00e4m\u00e4 pisteet ovat l\u00e4hes identtiset molemmilla Windows-k\u00e4sikonsoleilla, ja jos suorittaisimme testin uudelleen, tulos olisi todenn\u00e4k\u00f6isesti 1 ruutu kummallakin puolella.<\/p>\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-large is-resized\"><a href=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-and-AMD-5800U-Forza-Horizon-5.png\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-and-AMD-5800U-Forza-Horizon-5-1024x576.png\" alt=\"ONEXPLAYER Mini ja AMD 5800U Forza Horizon 5 -n&#xE4;yt&#xF6;nohjain\" class=\"wp-image-21386\" width=\"768\" height=\"432\" srcset=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-and-AMD-5800U-Forza-Horizon-5-1024x576.png 1024w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-and-AMD-5800U-Forza-Horizon-5-300x169.png 300w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-and-AMD-5800U-Forza-Horizon-5-768x432.png 768w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-and-AMD-5800U-Forza-Horizon-5-1536x864.png 1536w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-and-AMD-5800U-Forza-Horizon-5-450x253.png 450w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-and-AMD-5800U-Forza-Horizon-5-780x439.png 780w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-and-AMD-5800U-Forza-Horizon-5-1600x900.png 1600w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-and-AMD-5800U-Forza-Horizon-5.png 1920w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 768px) 100vw, 768px\" \/><\/a><figcaption>Forza Horizon 5 Benchmark-vertailu<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<p>Verrattaessa tuloksia muihin Windows-pelik\u00e4mmenlaitteisiin 20 W:n TDP:ll\u00e4, voimme n\u00e4hd\u00e4, ett\u00e4 AMD ja Mini johtavat <a href=\"https:\/\/droix.eu\/fi\/product\/ayaneo-next\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">AYA NEO NEXT<\/a> -malleja muutamalla ruudulla. Muista, ett\u00e4 AYA-mallit testattiin hieman vanhemmilla Windows-versioilla ja ajureilla, mik\u00e4 saattaa aiheuttaa yhden tai kahden ruudun eron.<\/p>\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-shadow-of-the-tomb-raider\">Shadow of the Tomb Raider<\/h3>\n\n<p>Seuraavaksi pelien vertailussa on vuorossa Shadow of the Tomb Raider. K\u00e4yt\u00e4mme 1280&#215;800-resoluutiota alimmilla oletusarvoisilla grafiikka-asetuksilla.<\/p>\n\n<p>ONEXPLAYER AMD:ll\u00e4 tulokset ovat 40, 57 ja 64 kuvaa sekunnissa, ja Minill\u00e4 42, 55 ja 59 kuvaa sekunnissa. Pistem\u00e4\u00e4riss\u00e4 on hieman vaihtelua, ja korkeimmat pisteet vaihtelevat n\u00e4iden kahden v\u00e4lill\u00e4 eri TDP-arvoilla.<\/p>\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-large is-resized\"><a href=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-and-AMD-5800U-Shadow-of-the-Tomb-Raider.png\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-and-AMD-5800U-Shadow-of-the-Tomb-Raider-1024x576.png\" alt=\"ONEXPLAYER Mini ja AMD 5800U Shadow of the Tomb Raider -elokuvanohjain\" class=\"wp-image-21391\" width=\"768\" height=\"432\" srcset=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-and-AMD-5800U-Shadow-of-the-Tomb-Raider-1024x576.png 1024w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-and-AMD-5800U-Shadow-of-the-Tomb-Raider-300x169.png 300w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-and-AMD-5800U-Shadow-of-the-Tomb-Raider-768x432.png 768w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-and-AMD-5800U-Shadow-of-the-Tomb-Raider-1536x864.png 1536w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-and-AMD-5800U-Shadow-of-the-Tomb-Raider-450x253.png 450w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-and-AMD-5800U-Shadow-of-the-Tomb-Raider-780x439.png 780w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-and-AMD-5800U-Shadow-of-the-Tomb-Raider-1600x900.png 1600w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-and-AMD-5800U-Shadow-of-the-Tomb-Raider.png 1920w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 768px) 100vw, 768px\" \/><\/a><figcaption>Shadow of the Tomb Raider Benchmark-vertailu<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<p>Vertailuissamme n\u00e4emme, ett\u00e4 5800U- ja 5825U-mallit ovat saavuttamassa ONEXPLAYER Mini Intel -mallia. Emme ole varmoja, miksi Mini sai alhaisemmat 20 ja 35 W:n pisteet, sill\u00e4 suoritamme jokaisen vertailuarvon vain kerran, jotta saamme reilun mahdollisuuden.<\/p>\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-street-fighter-v\">Street Fighter V<\/h3>\n\n<p>Street Fighter V -vertailussa tarkistamme keskim\u00e4\u00e4r\u00e4isen kuvanopeuden ensimm\u00e4isen ottelun lopussa. K\u00e4yt\u00e4mme 1280&#215;800-resoluutiota suurimmilla grafiikka-asetuksilla 11, 20 ja 35 W TDP:ll\u00e4.<\/p>\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-large is-resized\"><a href=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Street-Fighter-V-results.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Street-Fighter-V-results-1024x576.jpg\" alt=\"ONEXPLAYER 5800U Street Fighter V tulokset\" class=\"wp-image-21451\" width=\"768\" height=\"432\" srcset=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Street-Fighter-V-results-1024x576.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Street-Fighter-V-results-300x169.jpg 300w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Street-Fighter-V-results-768x432.jpg 768w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Street-Fighter-V-results-1536x864.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Street-Fighter-V-results-450x253.jpg 450w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Street-Fighter-V-results-780x439.jpg 780w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Street-Fighter-V-results-1600x900.jpg 1600w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Street-Fighter-V-results.jpg 1920w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 768px) 100vw, 768px\" \/><\/a><figcaption>ONEXPLAYER 5800U Street Fighter V tulokset<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<p>ONEXPLAYER AMD:n keskiarvot ovat 41,94, 55,35 ja 58,88 kuvaa sekunnissa. Minin tulokset ovat 45,75, 56,35 ja 58,91 FPS. 11 W:n TDP-arvoissa on havaittavissa huomattava ero, mutta 20 ja 35 W:n TDP-arvoissa ei juuri mit\u00e4\u00e4n.<\/p>\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-large is-resized\"><a href=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-and-AMD-5800U-Street-Fighter-V.png\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-and-AMD-5800U-Street-Fighter-V-1024x576.png\" alt=\"ONEXPLAYER Mini ja AMD 5800U Street Fighter V\" class=\"wp-image-21396\" width=\"768\" height=\"432\" srcset=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-and-AMD-5800U-Street-Fighter-V-1024x576.png 1024w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-and-AMD-5800U-Street-Fighter-V-300x169.png 300w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-and-AMD-5800U-Street-Fighter-V-768x432.png 768w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-and-AMD-5800U-Street-Fighter-V-1536x864.png 1536w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-and-AMD-5800U-Street-Fighter-V-450x253.png 450w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-and-AMD-5800U-Street-Fighter-V-780x439.png 780w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-and-AMD-5800U-Street-Fighter-V-1600x900.png 1600w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-and-AMD-5800U-Street-Fighter-V.png 1920w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 768px) 100vw, 768px\" \/><\/a><figcaption>Street Fighter V Benchmark-vertailu<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<p>K\u00e4sikonsolivertailussamme n\u00e4emme, ett\u00e4 yksik\u00e4\u00e4n AMD:n laitteista ei viel\u00e4 saavuta 60 FPS:n tavoitetta. Mutta ne ovat yh\u00e4 l\u00e4hemp\u00e4n\u00e4 jokaisen uuden mallin my\u00f6t\u00e4. Kaiken kaikkiaan 5800U:n tulokset ovat samanlaiset 20 ja 35 W:n TDP-arvoilla.<\/p>\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-final-fantasy-xiv\">Final Fantasy XIV<\/h3>\n\n<p>Viimeinen pelipenkkimme on Final Fantasy XIV, jota py\u00f6rit\u00e4mme 1280&#215;800-n\u00e4yt\u00f6nohjaimella suurimmilla grafiikka-asetuksilla.<\/p>\n\n<p>ONEXPLAYER AMD:n pisteet ovat 4,005, 5,250 ja 5,871 kaikissa kolmessa TDP:ss\u00e4. ONEXPAYER Mini saa pisteet 4,383, 5,359 ja 5,930.<\/p>\n\n<p>AMD:n ja Minin v\u00e4lill\u00e4 on melko suuri ero 11 W:n TDP-arvossa. Kun TDP-arvo nousee, tulokset tasoittuvat.<\/p>\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-large is-resized\"><a href=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-and-AMD-5800U-Final-Fantasy-XIV-1024x576.png\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-and-AMD-5800U-Final-Fantasy-XIV-1024x576.png\" alt=\"ONEXPLAYER Mini ja AMD 5800U Final Fantasy XIV\" class=\"wp-image-21401\" width=\"768\" height=\"432\" srcset=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-and-AMD-5800U-Final-Fantasy-XIV-1024x576.png 1024w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-and-AMD-5800U-Final-Fantasy-XIV-300x169.png 300w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-and-AMD-5800U-Final-Fantasy-XIV-768x432.png 768w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-and-AMD-5800U-Final-Fantasy-XIV-1536x864.png 1536w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-and-AMD-5800U-Final-Fantasy-XIV-450x253.png 450w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-and-AMD-5800U-Final-Fantasy-XIV-780x439.png 780w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-and-AMD-5800U-Final-Fantasy-XIV-1600x900.png 1600w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-and-AMD-5800U-Final-Fantasy-XIV.png 1920w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 768px) 100vw, 768px\" \/><\/a><figcaption>Final Fantasy XIV Benchmark-vertailu<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<p>Vertailussamme n\u00e4emme, ett\u00e4 5800U- ja 5825U-mallit ovat suunnilleen samalla tasolla kesken\u00e4\u00e4n. Intel 1195G7 johtaa kuitenkin j\u00e4lleen ylivoimaisesti 27 prosentin piste-erolla.<\/p>\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-benchmark-summary\">Yhteenveto vertailuarvoista<\/h2>\n\n<p>Lyhyt katsaus kaikkiin Games-pelin vertailuarvoihin ja vertailu muihin AMD- ja Intel-pohjaisiin kannettaviin tietokoneisiin 20 W TDP:ll\u00e4.<\/p>\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table><tbody><tr><td><\/td><td><strong>PCMARK<\/strong><\/td><td><strong>3DMARK<\/strong><\/td><td><strong>FORZA HORIZON 5<\/strong><\/td><td><strong>STREET FIGHTER V<\/strong><\/td><td><strong>FINAL FANTASY XIV<\/strong><\/td><td><strong>SHADOW OF THE TOMB RAIDER<\/strong><\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>AYA NEO NEXT PRO (5825U)<\/strong><\/td><td>5819<\/td><td>1455<\/td><td>78 FPS<\/td><td>56,39 FPS<\/td><td>5388<\/td><td> 58 FPS<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>AYA NEO NEXT ADV. (5800U)<\/strong><\/td><td>5733<\/td><td>1351<\/td><td>77 FPS<\/td><td>54,63 FPS<\/td><td>5282<\/td><td>57 FPS<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>AYA NEO 2021 (4500U)<\/strong><\/td><td>4894<\/td><td>1083<\/td><td>68 FPS<\/td><td>47,42 FPS<\/td><td>4649<\/td><td>50 FPS<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>AYA NEO 2021 PRO (4800U)<\/strong><\/td><td>5256<\/td><td>1329<\/td><td>73 FPS<\/td><td>51,51 FPS<\/td><td>5068<\/td><td>54 FPS<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>ONEXPLAYER MINI (1195G7)<\/strong><\/td><td>5253<\/td><td>1123<\/td><td>68 FPS<\/td><td>60 FPS<\/td><td>5470<\/td><td>62 FPS<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong><strong>ONEXPLAYER<\/strong> MINI (5800U)<\/strong><\/td><td>5687<\/td><td>1366<\/td><td>78 FPS<\/td><td>56,53 FPS<\/td><td>5359<\/td><td>55 FPS<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong><strong>ONEXPLAYER<\/strong> AMD (5800U)<\/strong><\/td><td>5641<\/td><td>1304<\/td><td>77 FPS<\/td><td>55,35 FPS<\/td><td>5250<\/td><td>57 FPS<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><figcaption>Tulokset 20W TDP-vertailuarvoista<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n<p>ONEXPLAYER AMD ja Mini p\u00e4rj\u00e4\u00e4v\u00e4t kaiken kaikkiaan melko hyvin ja saavat kilpailukykyiset pisteet pelien vertailuarvoissa. J\u00e4rjestelm\u00e4n vertailuarvot ovat kuitenkin hieman alhaisemmat kuin AYA NEO NEXT PRO -mallissa. T\u00e4m\u00e4 johtuu todenn\u00e4k\u00f6isesti AYA:n ja ONEXPLAYERin k\u00e4ytt\u00e4mien RAM-muistien ja tallennusnopeuksien erosta.<\/p>\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Mik\u00e4 Windows-pelik\u00e4mmenlaite minun pit\u00e4isi ostaa?<\/h2>\n\n<p>Mik\u00e4 ONEXPLAYER AMD:n ja Minin malleista on paras kannettava pelikonsoli? AMD:ll\u00e4 on suurempi laite ja suurempi n\u00e4ytt\u00f6, jossa on suurempi resoluutio. Unohtamatta ainutlaatuisia ominaisuuksia, kuten sormenj\u00e4lkitunnistinta ja jalustaa&#8230;  <\/p>\n\n<p>ONEXPLAYER Minin suorituskyky on kuitenkin yleisesti ottaen hieman parempi kuin AMD:n. Se on pienempi ja helpompi kuljettaa. Et ehk\u00e4 pid\u00e4 n\u00e4in suuresta n\u00e4yt\u00f6st\u00e4 kannettavassa tietokoneessa tai haluat ehk\u00e4 mieluummin pienemm\u00e4n natiiviresoluution, jotta pelit toimisivat nopeammin, jos k\u00e4yt\u00e4t sit\u00e4.<\/p>\n\n<p>Molemmat ovat loistavia k\u00e4mmenmikroja omalla tavallaan, joten voi olla henkil\u00f6kohtainen valinta, kumpi sopii sinulle parhaiten.  <\/p>\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-games-performance\">Pelien suorituskyky<\/h2>\n\n<p>Lopetamme ONEXPLAYER AMD &amp; Mini 5800U -katsauksen lyhyell\u00e4 katsauksella pelattavaan ja emulaattorikuvamateriaaliin, joka on asetettu pelattavaksi sen sijaan, ett\u00e4 kaikki olisi v\u00e4\u00e4nnetty maksimiin.<\/p>\n\n<p>Kokeilimme erilaisia pelej\u00e4 ja totesimme, ett\u00e4 suorituskyky on melko lailla sama kuin AYA NEO NEXT PRO:lla. K\u00e4ytimme hieman vanhempia Windows- ja grafiikkaohjaimia, joiden ei pit\u00e4isi aiheuttaa suurta eroa suorituskyvyss\u00e4.<\/p>\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"576\" src=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Elden-Ring-1024x576.jpg\" alt=\"ONEXPLAYER 5800U Eldenin rengas\" class=\"wp-image-21456\" srcset=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Elden-Ring-1024x576.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Elden-Ring-300x169.jpg 300w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Elden-Ring-768x432.jpg 768w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Elden-Ring-1536x864.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Elden-Ring-450x253.jpg 450w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Elden-Ring-780x439.jpg 780w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Elden-Ring-1600x900.jpg 1600w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Elden-Ring.jpg 1920w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n<p>Elden Ringin kanssa pelaamme 1280&#215;800-n\u00e4yt\u00f6ll\u00e4 ja sekoitamme enimm\u00e4kseen matalia ja joitain keskitasoisia grafiikka-asetuksia, ja saimme hyvin pelattavat ruudunp\u00e4ivitysnopeudet. Voit lukita ruudunp\u00e4ivitysnopeuden 30:een ja nostaa grafiikka-asetuksia hieman.<\/p>\n\n<p>Forza Horizon 5:n grafiikka-asetukset ovat 1280&#215;800 ja alhaisimmat. Penkkitesteist\u00e4 tied\u00e4mme, ett\u00e4 saimme reilusti yli 60 kuvaa sekunnissa. Pelattavuus oli eritt\u00e4in sulavaa, kun se oli lukittu 60:een. Voit halutessasi k\u00e4ytt\u00e4\u00e4 korkeampia grafiikka-asetuksia.<\/p>\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-large is-resized\"><a href=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-LEGO-Star-Wars.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-LEGO-Star-Wars-1024x576.jpg\" alt=\"ONEXPLAYER 5800U LEGO T&#xE4;htien sota LEGO Star Wars\" class=\"wp-image-21461\" width=\"768\" height=\"432\" srcset=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-LEGO-Star-Wars-1024x576.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-LEGO-Star-Wars-300x169.jpg 300w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-LEGO-Star-Wars-768x432.jpg 768w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-LEGO-Star-Wars-1536x864.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-LEGO-Star-Wars-450x253.jpg 450w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-LEGO-Star-Wars-780x439.jpg 780w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-LEGO-Star-Wars-1600x900.jpg 1600w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-LEGO-Star-Wars.jpg 1920w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 768px) 100vw, 768px\" \/><\/a><figcaption>ONEXPLAYER 5800U LEGO T\u00e4htien sota LEGO Star Wars<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<p>Halusimme kokeilla LEGO Star Wars Skywalker Saga -peli\u00e4 ONEXPLAYER AMD:n natiiviresoluutiolla 2560&#215;1600 ja Medium-asetuksilla. LEGO Star Wars -peliss\u00e4 pelattavuus on aivan kunnossa ilman ongelmia, mutta joidenkin muiden pelien kanssa et saa samaa kokemusta natiiviresoluutiolla.<\/p>\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-emulator-performance\">Emulaattorin suorituskyky<\/h2>\n\n<p>Emuloinnin suorituskyky on samaa luokkaa kuin 5825U-k\u00e4ytt\u00f6j\u00e4rjestelm\u00e4ll\u00e4 varustetulla <a href=\"https:\/\/droix.eu\/fi\/product\/ayaneo-next-pro\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">AYA NEO NEXT Prolla<\/a>, ja saamme hyvi\u00e4 tuloksia. Molemmat mallit pystyv\u00e4t emuloimaan kaikki klassiset 8-, 16- ja 32-bittiset konsolit. Kun siirryt\u00e4\u00e4n uudempiin konsoleihin, suorituskyky on hyv\u00e4. Muista, ett\u00e4 esittelem\u00e4mme emulaattorit ovat viel\u00e4 aktiivisessa kehitysty\u00f6ss\u00e4, eiv\u00e4tk\u00e4 ne v\u00e4ltt\u00e4m\u00e4tt\u00e4 ole t\u00e4ysin optimoituja.<\/p>\n\n<p>Alkuper\u00e4inen Xbox-emulointi on kohdallaan. Voit nauttia yhteensopivista peleist\u00e4 t\u00e4ydell\u00e4 nopeudella, ja voit yleens\u00e4 lis\u00e4t\u00e4 render\u00f6intitarkkuutta parantaaksesi grafiikkaa.<\/p>\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-large is-resized\"><a href=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Xemu.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Xemu-1024x576.jpg\" alt=\"ONEXPLAYER 5800U Xemu Xbox-emulaattori\" class=\"wp-image-21466\" width=\"768\" height=\"432\" srcset=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Xemu-1024x576.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Xemu-300x169.jpg 300w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Xemu-768x432.jpg 768w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Xemu-1536x864.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Xemu-450x253.jpg 450w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Xemu-780x439.jpg 780w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Xemu-1600x900.jpg 1600w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Xemu.jpg 1920w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 768px) 100vw, 768px\" \/><\/a><figcaption>ONEXPLAYER 5800U Xemu Xbox-emulaattori<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<p>Citra-emulaattori toimii my\u00f6s h\u00e4mm\u00e4stytt\u00e4v\u00e4n hyvin. Voit tietysti muuttaa n\u00e4ytt\u00f6\u00e4 niin, ett\u00e4 n\u00e4yt\u00e4t yhden n\u00e4yt\u00f6n suurempana tai koko n\u00e4yt\u00f6n kokoisena, tai n\u00e4ytt\u00e4\u00e4 molemmat, kuten me nyt teemme. Meill\u00e4 ei ollut ongelmia suorituskyvyn kanssa.<\/p>\n\n<p>PlayStation 2:n suorituskyky on h\u00e4mm\u00e4stytt\u00e4v\u00e4. Voit nauttia peleist\u00e4 korkeammilla render\u00f6intitarkkuuksilla ja s\u00e4ilytt\u00e4\u00e4 silti vakaan 60 ruudun sekuntinopeuden. Pelit n\u00e4ytt\u00e4v\u00e4t todella upeilta ONEXPLAYERin n\u00e4yt\u00f6ill\u00e4.<\/p>\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-large is-resized\"><a href=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-RPCS3.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-RPCS3-1024x576.jpg\" alt=\"ONEXPLAYER 5800U PlayStation 3 RPCS3 RPCS3\" class=\"wp-image-21471\" width=\"768\" height=\"432\" srcset=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-RPCS3-1024x576.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-RPCS3-300x169.jpg 300w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-RPCS3-768x432.jpg 768w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-RPCS3-1536x864.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-RPCS3-450x253.jpg 450w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-RPCS3-780x439.jpg 780w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-RPCS3-1600x900.jpg 1600w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-RPCS3.jpg 1920w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 768px) 100vw, 768px\" \/><\/a><figcaption>ONEXPLAYER 5800U PlayStation 3 RPCS3 RPCS3<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<p>PlayStation 3 -emulaatiossa, kuten kaikissa k\u00e4mmenlaitteissa, on joitakin suorituskykyongelmia. Se voi riippua pelattavasta pelist\u00e4 sek\u00e4 emulaattorien yhteensopivuudesta. K\u00e4yt\u00e4mme WipeOut HD:t\u00e4 lukitulla 30 kuvan sekuntinopeudella, ja se toimii loistavasti.<\/p>\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-large is-resized\"><a href=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Cruisin-Blast.png\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Cruisin-Blast-1024x576.png\" alt=\"ONEXPLAYER 5800U Ryujinx Cruisin Blast Ryujinx Cruisin Blast ONEXPLAYER 5800U\" class=\"wp-image-21476\" width=\"768\" height=\"432\" srcset=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Cruisin-Blast-1024x576.png 1024w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Cruisin-Blast-300x169.png 300w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Cruisin-Blast-768x432.png 768w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Cruisin-Blast-1536x864.png 1536w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Cruisin-Blast-450x253.png 450w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Cruisin-Blast-780x439.png 780w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Cruisin-Blast-1600x900.png 1600w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Cruisin-Blast.png 1920w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 768px) 100vw, 768px\" \/><\/a><figcaption>ONEXPLAYER 5800U Ryujinx Cruisi'n Blast Ryujinx Cruisi'n Blast<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<p>Ja p\u00e4\u00e4t\u00e4mme ONEXPLAYER AMD &amp; MINI 5800U -arvostelumme RyuJinx-emulaattorilla. T\u00e4m\u00e4kin on viel\u00e4 aktiivisessa kehityksess\u00e4, joten suorituskyky voi vaihdella. Kokeilimme kuitenkin useita pelej\u00e4, ja ne toimivat t\u00e4ydell\u00e4 nopeudella tai ainakin pelattavilla nopeuksilla.<\/p>\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Mist\u00e4 ostaa ONEXPLAYER AMD ja Mini 5800U?<\/h2>\n\n<p>T\u00e4m\u00e4 p\u00e4\u00e4tt\u00e4\u00e4 ONEXPLAYER AMD- ja Mini-mallien tarkastelun, toivottavasti se oli sinulle hy\u00f6dyllinen. Lis\u00e4tietoja <a href=\"https:\/\/droix.eu\/fi\/product\/onexplayer-amd\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">ONEXPLAYER AMD 5800U<\/a>:sta saat <a href=\"https:\/\/droix.eu\/fi\/product\/onexplayer-amd\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">t\u00e4\u00e4lt\u00e4 ja voit ostaa<\/a> sen t\u00e4\u00e4lt\u00e4, ja <a href=\"https:\/\/droix.eu\/fi\/product\/onexplayer-mini\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">ONEXPLAYER Mini 5800U:<\/a>n voit ostaa <a href=\"https:\/\/droix.eu\/fi\/product\/onexplayer-mini\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">t\u00e4\u00e4lt\u00e4<\/a>. Voit selata <a href=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/product-category\/handhelds\/handheld-game-consoles\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">k\u00e4sikonsolivalikoimaamme t\u00e4\u00e4ll\u00e4<\/a>,<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>ONEXPLAYER AMD &amp; MINI 5800U -katsauksessamme vertailemme molempien suorituskyky\u00e4 joillakin j\u00e4rjestelm\u00e4-, peli- ja emulaattoritesteill\u00e4.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":859,"featured_media":60304,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[766],"tags":[1565,972,982],"class_list":{"0":"post-73933","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-uncategorized-fi","8":"tag-onexplayer-fi","9":"tag-pelaaminen","10":"tag-pelikammenlaitteet"},"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/fi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/73933","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/fi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/fi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/fi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/859"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/fi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=73933"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/fi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/73933\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/fi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/60304"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/fi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=73933"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/fi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=73933"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/fi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=73933"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}