{"id":73905,"date":"2022-05-26T17:00:01","date_gmt":"2022-05-26T16:00:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/analise-e-comparacao-do-onexplayer-amd-mini-5800u-com-video\/"},"modified":"2023-07-13T11:41:53","modified_gmt":"2023-07-13T10:41:53","slug":"analise-e-comparacao-do-onexplayer-amd-mini-5800u-com-video","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/pt-pt\/analise-e-comparacao-do-onexplayer-amd-mini-5800u-com-video\/","title":{"rendered":"An\u00e1lise e compara\u00e7\u00e3o do ONEXPLAYER AMD &amp; MINI 5800U com v\u00eddeo"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Na nossa an\u00e1lise, estamos a verificar os dois novos modelos AMD 5800U da <a href=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/brand\/onexplayer\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">ONEXPLAYER<\/a>, o <a href=\"https:\/\/droix.eu\/pt-pt\/product\/onexplayer-amd\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">ONEXPLAYER AMD<\/a> e o <a href=\"https:\/\/droix.eu\/pt-pt\/product\/onexplayer-mini\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">ONEXPLAYER Mini<\/a>. Vamos desembal\u00e1-los, verificar as suas caracter\u00edsticas e efetuar algumas an\u00e1lises comparativas do sistema e dos jogos, seguidas de alguns testes de jogos e emuladores.<\/p>\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">V\u00eddeo de avalia\u00e7\u00e3o do ONEXPLAYER AMD &amp; MINI 5800U<\/h2>\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-embed is-type-video is-provider-youtube wp-block-embed-youtube wp-embed-aspect-16-9 wp-has-aspect-ratio\"><div class=\"wp-block-embed__wrapper\">\n<iframe loading=\"lazy\" title=\"ONEXPLAYER AMD and Mini Ryzen 5800U review and comparison with other Windows gaming handhelds\" width=\"1170\" height=\"658\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/r6OyVd9zpaA?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share\" referrerpolicy=\"strict-origin-when-cross-origin\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe>\n<\/div><\/figure>\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-onexplayer-amd-mini-5800u-unboxing\">ONEXPLAYER AMD &amp; MINI 5800U Unboxing<\/h2>\n\n<p>Vamos come\u00e7ar a an\u00e1lise do ONEXPLAYER AMD &amp; MINI 5800U com a desembalagem do <a href=\"https:\/\/droix.eu\/pt-pt\/product\/onexplayer-mini\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">ONEXPLAYER Mini<\/a>. No seu interior encontra-se o PC para jogos port\u00e1til ONEXPLAYER Mini, que iremos analisar mais de perto dentro de momentos.  <\/p>\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-large is-resized\"><a href=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-5800U-Unboxed.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-5800U-Unboxed-1024x576.jpg\" alt=\"ONEXPLAYER Mini 5800U sem caixa\" class=\"wp-image-21406\" width=\"768\" height=\"432\" srcset=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-5800U-Unboxed-1024x576.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-5800U-Unboxed-300x169.jpg 300w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-5800U-Unboxed-768x432.jpg 768w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-5800U-Unboxed-1536x864.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-5800U-Unboxed-450x253.jpg 450w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-5800U-Unboxed-780x439.jpg 780w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-5800U-Unboxed-1600x900.jpg 1600w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-5800U-Unboxed.jpg 1920w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 768px) 100vw, 768px\" \/><\/a><figcaption>ONEXPLAYER Mini 5800U sem caixa<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<p>De seguida, temos um guia de in\u00edcio r\u00e1pido. Para ser justo, n\u00e3o h\u00e1 muito nele, h\u00e1 um pouco de texto em ingl\u00eas, mas n\u00e3o \u00e9 realmente necess\u00e1rio. Dentro da primeira caixa encontra-se uma fonte de alimenta\u00e7\u00e3o USB. Incluiremos o adaptador correto para o seu pa\u00eds aquando da encomenda. E, por \u00faltimo, mas n\u00e3o menos importante, existe um cabo de carregamento USB tipo C.<\/p>\n\n<p>E passando para o modelo maior <a href=\"https:\/\/droix.eu\/pt-pt\/product\/onexplayer-amd\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">ONEXPLAYER AMD<\/a>. No interior, encontra-se o PC port\u00e1til para jogos ONEXPLAYER AMD, que tamb\u00e9m iremos analisar mais de perto em breve.  <\/p>\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-large is-resized\"><a href=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-AMD-5800U-Unboxed-1024x576.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-AMD-5800U-Unboxed-1024x576.jpg\" alt=\"ONEXPLAYER AMD 5800U sem caixa\" class=\"wp-image-21411\" width=\"768\" height=\"432\" srcset=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-AMD-5800U-Unboxed-1024x576.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-AMD-5800U-Unboxed-300x169.jpg 300w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-AMD-5800U-Unboxed-768x432.jpg 768w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-AMD-5800U-Unboxed-1536x864.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-AMD-5800U-Unboxed-450x253.jpg 450w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-AMD-5800U-Unboxed-780x439.jpg 780w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-AMD-5800U-Unboxed-1600x900.jpg 1600w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-AMD-5800U-Unboxed.jpg 1920w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 768px) 100vw, 768px\" \/><\/a><figcaption>ONEXPLAYER AMD 5800U sem caixa<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<p>Existe um guia de in\u00edcio r\u00e1pido. Este tem um pouco mais de informa\u00e7\u00e3o e tem mais texto em ingl\u00eas. A caixa inclui ainda uma fonte de alimenta\u00e7\u00e3o USB e um cabo de carregamento USB tipo C. Tal como anteriormente, incluiremos o adaptador de corrente correto para o seu pa\u00eds.<\/p>\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-overview-of-the-onexplayer-amd-mini-5800u\">Descri\u00e7\u00e3o geral do ONEXPLAYER AMD &amp; MINI 5800U<\/h2>\n\n<p>O <a href=\"https:\/\/droix.eu\/pt-pt\/product\/onexplayer-amd\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">ONEXPLAYER AMD<\/a> mede 11,3 x 5,1 x 0,9 polegadas. O <a href=\"https:\/\/droix.eu\/pt-pt\/product\/onexplayer-mini\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">ONEXPLAYER Mini<\/a> mede 10,23 x 4,1 x 0,9 polegadas.<\/p>\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-large is-resized\"><a href=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-5800U-Dimensions.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-5800U-Dimensions-1024x576.jpg\" alt=\"Dimens&#xF5;es do ONEXPLAYER Mini 5800U\" class=\"wp-image-21416\" width=\"768\" height=\"432\" srcset=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-5800U-Dimensions-1024x576.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-5800U-Dimensions-300x169.jpg 300w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-5800U-Dimensions-768x432.jpg 768w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-5800U-Dimensions-1536x864.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-5800U-Dimensions-450x253.jpg 450w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-5800U-Dimensions-780x439.jpg 780w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-5800U-Dimensions-1600x900.jpg 1600w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-5800U-Dimensions.jpg 1920w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 768px) 100vw, 768px\" \/><\/a><figcaption>Dimens\u00f5es do ONEXPLAYER Mini 5800U<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<p>O ecr\u00e3 AMD tem 8,4 polegadas e uma resolu\u00e7\u00e3o de 2560&#215;1600. O ecr\u00e3 do Mini tem 7 polegadas e uma resolu\u00e7\u00e3o de 1920&#215;1200. Isto \u00e9 algo a ter em conta se estiver a planear jogar jogos com a resolu\u00e7\u00e3o nativa. Quanto maior for a resolu\u00e7\u00e3o, maior ser\u00e1 a capacidade de processamento utilizada.<\/p>\n\n<p>Ambos os dispositivos t\u00eam essencialmente o mesmo aspeto na parte frontal. Tens os man\u00edpulos anal\u00f3gicos duplos, o D-pad e os bot\u00f5es de jogo.<\/p>\n\n<p>Olhando para a \u00e1rea inferior direita, h\u00e1 uma diferen\u00e7a num bot\u00e3o. No ONEXPLAYER AMD existe um bot\u00e3o Turbo para alternar facilmente o TDP. No caso do Mini, \u00e9 substitu\u00eddo por uma funcionalidade de Modo Noturno que reduz a velocidade e o ru\u00eddo da ventoinha. Pode utilizar software como o <a href=\"https:\/\/ryzencontroller.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Ryzen Controller<\/a> para alterar o TDP e recomendamos que o fa\u00e7a desta forma.<\/p>\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-large is-resized\"><a href=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Top-view.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Top-view-1024x576.jpg\" alt=\"ONEXPLAYER 5800U Vista superior\" class=\"wp-image-21421\" width=\"768\" height=\"432\" srcset=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Top-view-1024x576.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Top-view-300x169.jpg 300w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Top-view-768x432.jpg 768w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Top-view-1536x864.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Top-view-450x253.jpg 450w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Top-view-780x439.jpg 780w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Top-view-1600x900.jpg 1600w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Top-view.jpg 1920w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 768px) 100vw, 768px\" \/><\/a><figcaption>ONEXPLAYER 5800U Vista superior<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<p>Ambos os modelos t\u00eam os bot\u00f5es de ombro e de gatilho padr\u00e3o esquerdo e direito. O modelo AMD tem duas portas USB Type-C na parte superior, o Mini tem uma na parte superior e outra na parte inferior do dispositivo. Ambos t\u00eam uma porta USB 3 na parte superior.<\/p>\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"576\" src=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Back-View-1024x576.jpg\" alt=\"ONEXPLAYER 5800U Vista posterior\" class=\"wp-image-21426\" srcset=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Back-View-1024x576.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Back-View-300x169.jpg 300w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Back-View-768x432.jpg 768w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Back-View-1536x864.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Back-View-450x253.jpg 450w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Back-View-780x439.jpg 780w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Back-View-1600x900.jpg 1600w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Back-View.jpg 1920w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><figcaption>ONEXPLAYER 5800U Vista posterior<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n<p>No ONEXPLAYER AMD existe um suporte para manter o dispositivo na vertical na sua secret\u00e1ria. Existe um bot\u00e3o para ligar\/desligar e pode encontrar o bot\u00e3o para aumentar e diminuir o volume, bem como um bot\u00e3o dedicado para silenciar o volume.<\/p>\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-onexplayer-amd-mini-5800u-technical-specifications\">Especifica\u00e7\u00f5es t\u00e9cnicas do ONEXPLAYER AMD &amp; MINI 5800U<\/h2>\n\n<p>Continuando a nossa an\u00e1lise do ONEXPLAYER AMD &amp; MINI 5800U, damos uma vista de olhos \u00e0s especifica\u00e7\u00f5es t\u00e9cnicas. Ambos os modelos s\u00e3o essencialmente o mesmo hardware, mas com tamanhos de ecr\u00e3 e de caixa diferentes.<\/p>\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table><tbody><tr><td><\/td><td><strong>ONEXPLAYER AMD 5800U<\/strong><\/td><td><strong>ONEXPLAYER Mini 5800U<\/strong><\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>CPU<\/strong><\/td><td>AMD Ryzen 7 5800U, Zen 3, 8 n\u00facleos 16 threads<br\/>Frequ\u00eancia de base de 1,90 GHz, frequ\u00eancia turbo m\u00e1xima de 4,4 GHz<br\/>Predefini\u00e7\u00e3o 25W TDP<\/td><td>AMD Ryzen 7 5800U, Zen 3, 8 n\u00facleos 16 threads<br\/>Frequ\u00eancia de base de 1,90 GHz, frequ\u00eancia turbo m\u00e1xima de 4,4 GHz<br\/>Predefini\u00e7\u00e3o 25W TDP<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>GPU<\/strong><\/td><td>Gr\u00e1ficos AMD Radeon, 8 n\u00facleos a 2000 MHz<\/td><td>Gr\u00e1ficos AMD Radeon, 8 n\u00facleos a 2000 MHz<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>RAM<\/strong><\/td><td>16GB de mem\u00f3ria LPDDR4x 4.266MHz de canal duplo<\/td><td>16GB de mem\u00f3ria LPDDR4x 4.266MHz de canal duplo<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>ARMAZENAMENTO<\/strong><\/td><td>1 ou 2TB M.2 2280 (NVMe) Armazenamento<br\/>PCle 3.0 x4<\/td><td>1 ou 2TB M.2 2280 (NVMe) Armazenamento<br\/>PCle 3.0 x4<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>COMUNICA\u00c7\u00d5ES<\/strong><\/td><td>Wi-Fi 6<br\/>Bluetooth 5.0<\/td><td>Wi-Fi 6<br\/>Bluetooth 5.0<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>BATERIA<\/strong><\/td><td>Bateria de 15.300 mAh<br\/>5 horas e 50 minutos em modo inativo<br\/>1 hora 48 em carga total<\/td><td>Bateria de 12.600 mAh<br\/>6 horas 10 minutos em inatividade<br\/>1 hora 57 em carga m\u00e1xima<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>RU\u00cdDO E TEMPERATURA DA VENTOINHA<\/strong><\/td><td>66dB em carga total<br\/>46\u00b0C \/ 114.8\u00b0F temperatura m\u00e1xima<\/td><td>66dB em carga total<br\/>41\u00b0C \/ 105.8\u00b0F temperatura m\u00e1xima<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><figcaption>Especifica\u00e7\u00f5es t\u00e9cnicas do ONEXPLAYER AMD &amp; MINI 5800U<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n<p>Ru\u00eddo da ventoinha e temperatura medidos durante a execu\u00e7\u00e3o do Cinebench durante 10 minutos.<\/p>\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-system-benchmarks\">Refer\u00eancias de sistema<\/h2>\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-passmark\">PassMark<\/h3>\n\n<p>Come\u00e7amos os testes de refer\u00eancia do sistema com o PassMark. Estamos a utiliz\u00e1-lo com uma resolu\u00e7\u00e3o de 4K e um TDP de 20W para nos mantermos em linha com os nossos testes anteriores de computadores port\u00e1teis. O PassMark efectua uma s\u00e9rie de testes \u00e0 CPU, GPU, RAM e armazenamento para os levar ao seu desempenho m\u00e1ximo.<\/p>\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-large is-resized\"><a href=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-PassMark-Results.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-PassMark-Results-1024x576.jpg\" alt=\"Resultados do PassMark do ONEXPLAYER 5800U\" class=\"wp-image-21431\" width=\"768\" height=\"432\" srcset=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-PassMark-Results-1024x576.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-PassMark-Results-300x169.jpg 300w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-PassMark-Results-768x432.jpg 768w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-PassMark-Results-1536x864.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-PassMark-Results-450x253.jpg 450w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-PassMark-Results-780x439.jpg 780w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-PassMark-Results-1600x900.jpg 1600w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-PassMark-Results.jpg 1920w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 768px) 100vw, 768px\" \/><\/a><figcaption>Resultados do PassMark do ONEXPLAYER 5800U<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<p>Obtemos uma pontua\u00e7\u00e3o de 4.734 no PC port\u00e1til <a href=\"https:\/\/droix.eu\/pt-pt\/product\/onexplayer-amd\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">ONEXPLAYER AMD<\/a> e uma pontua\u00e7\u00e3o mais elevada de 5.073 na consola port\u00e1til <a href=\"https:\/\/droix.eu\/pt-pt\/product\/onexplayer-mini\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">ONEXPLAYER Mini<\/a>. H\u00e1 uma diferen\u00e7a not\u00e1vel nas pontua\u00e7\u00f5es aqui, que ser\u00e1 interessante ver se se mant\u00e9m ao longo dos testes.<\/p>\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-pcmark\">PCMark<\/h3>\n\n<p>O nosso pr\u00f3ximo teste \u00e9 com o PCMark e estamos a correr a 4K a 20W TDP. O PCMark executa uma s\u00e9rie de testes baseados na utiliza\u00e7\u00e3o quotidiana de um PC. Estas incluem tarefas que v\u00e3o desde a navega\u00e7\u00e3o na Web, a velocidade de arranque do Windows, o carregamento de software, o trabalho com grandes documentos de escrit\u00f3rio e muito mais.<\/p>\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-large is-resized\"><a href=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-PCMark-Results.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-PCMark-Results-1024x576.jpg\" alt=\"Resultados do ONEXPLAYER 5800U PCMark\" class=\"wp-image-21436\" width=\"768\" height=\"432\" srcset=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-PCMark-Results-1024x576.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-PCMark-Results-300x169.jpg 300w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-PCMark-Results-768x432.jpg 768w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-PCMark-Results-1536x864.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-PCMark-Results-450x253.jpg 450w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-PCMark-Results-780x439.jpg 780w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-PCMark-Results-1600x900.jpg 1600w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-PCMark-Results.jpg 1920w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 768px) 100vw, 768px\" \/><\/a><figcaption>Resultados do ONEXPLAYER 5800U PCMark<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<p>Com o ONEXPLAYER AMD obtemos uma pontua\u00e7\u00e3o de 5,641. E com o ONEXPLAYER Mini obtemos uma pontua\u00e7\u00e3o de 5.687. As duas pontua\u00e7\u00f5es s\u00e3o praticamente as mesmas, o que \u00e9 bom de ver.<\/p>\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-3dmark\">3DMark<\/h3>\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/benchmarks.ul.com\/3dmark\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">O 3DMark<\/a> executa uma s\u00e9rie de testes com a CPU e a GPU para ver o seu desempenho em tarefas relacionadas com gr\u00e1ficos. Estas incluem o processamento de imagens e, claro, os jogos. Estamos a efetuar os testes com uma resolu\u00e7\u00e3o de 4K e com TDP de 11, 20 e 35W para ver como o desempenho muda com diferentes TDP.<\/p>\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-large is-resized\"><a href=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-3DMark-results.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-3DMark-results-1024x576.jpg\" alt=\"Resultados do ONEXPLAYER 5800U 3DMark\" class=\"wp-image-21441\" width=\"768\" height=\"432\" srcset=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-3DMark-results-1024x576.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-3DMark-results-300x169.jpg 300w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-3DMark-results-768x432.jpg 768w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-3DMark-results-1536x864.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-3DMark-results-450x253.jpg 450w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-3DMark-results-780x439.jpg 780w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-3DMark-results-1600x900.jpg 1600w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-3DMark-results.jpg 1920w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 768px) 100vw, 768px\" \/><\/a><figcaption>Resultados do ONEXPLAYER 5800U 3DMark<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<p>O computador de m\u00e3o para jogos ONEXPLAYER AMD obt\u00e9m 952, 1.304 e 1.460 pontos nos TDPs de 11, 20 e 35W. O computador de m\u00e3o ONEXPLAYER Mini obt\u00e9m 1.075, 1.366 e 1.465 pontos, respetivamente, nos tr\u00eas TDPs.  <\/p>\n\n<p>Existem diferen\u00e7as nas pontua\u00e7\u00f5es a 11 e 20W, e essencialmente o mesmo a 35W.<\/p>\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-large is-resized\"><a href=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-and-AMD-5800U-3D-Mark.png\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-and-AMD-5800U-3D-Mark-1024x576.png\" alt=\"Marca ONEXPLAYER Mini e AMD 5800U 3D\" class=\"wp-image-21381\" width=\"768\" height=\"432\" srcset=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-and-AMD-5800U-3D-Mark-1024x576.png 1024w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-and-AMD-5800U-3D-Mark-300x169.png 300w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-and-AMD-5800U-3D-Mark-768x432.png 768w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-and-AMD-5800U-3D-Mark-1536x864.png 1536w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-and-AMD-5800U-3D-Mark-450x253.png 450w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-and-AMD-5800U-3D-Mark-780x439.png 780w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-and-AMD-5800U-3D-Mark-1600x900.png 1600w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-and-AMD-5800U-3D-Mark.png 1920w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 768px) 100vw, 768px\" \/><\/a><figcaption>Compara\u00e7\u00e3o de benchmarks do 3D Mark<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<p id=\"h-putting-this-into-a-more-visual-form-we-can-see-that-the-amd-5800u-and-5825u-based-devices-have-varying-lower-tdp-scores-but-at-35w-they-are-scoring-in-the-same-ballpark\">Colocando isto numa forma mais visual, podemos ver que os dispositivos baseados em AMD 5800U e 5825U t\u00eam pontua\u00e7\u00f5es de TDP mais baixas, mas a 35W est\u00e3o a pontuar no mesmo patamar.<\/p>\n\n<p>H\u00e1 um bom aumento de desempenho em rela\u00e7\u00e3o \u00e0 gera\u00e7\u00e3o anterior de dispositivos baseados em AMD, variando entre 30% no modelo 4500U e 8% nos modelos 4800U.<\/p>\n\n<p>No entanto, o rei do 3DMark continua a ser o modelo ONEXPLAYER Mini Intel 1195G7, que tem uma excelente pontua\u00e7\u00e3o de 1.982.<\/p>\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-gaming-benchmarks\">Refer\u00eancias de jogos<\/h2>\n\n<p>Continuamos a an\u00e1lise do ONEXPLAYER AMD &amp; MINI 5800U com alguns benchmarks de jogos. Para podermos testar e comparar todas as consolas de forma justa, execut\u00e1mos os nossos testes de refer\u00eancia de jogos a 1280&#215;800, independentemente da resolu\u00e7\u00e3o da consola. A resolu\u00e7\u00e3o nativa do AMD \u00e9 de 2560&#215;1900 e a do Mini \u00e9 de 1920&#215;1200, o que significa que \u00e9 necess\u00e1ria mais capacidade de processamento para processar jogos nesta resolu\u00e7\u00e3o, pelo que n\u00e3o \u00e9 poss\u00edvel efetuar uma compara\u00e7\u00e3o de desempenho entre os dois.<\/p>\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-forza-horizon-5\">Forza Horizon 5<\/h3>\n\n<p>Come\u00e7amos os benchmarks de jogos com o Forza Horizon 5 a correr a 1280&#215;800 com as defini\u00e7\u00f5es gr\u00e1ficas muito baixas. Tamb\u00e9m estamos a testar a 11, 20 e 35W TDP para ver a diferen\u00e7a de desempenho.<\/p>\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-large is-resized\"><a href=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Forza-Horizon-5-results.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Forza-Horizon-5-results-1024x576.jpg\" alt=\"ONEXPLAYER 5800U Resultados do Forza Horizon 5\" class=\"wp-image-21446\" width=\"768\" height=\"432\" srcset=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Forza-Horizon-5-results-1024x576.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Forza-Horizon-5-results-300x169.jpg 300w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Forza-Horizon-5-results-768x432.jpg 768w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Forza-Horizon-5-results-1536x864.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Forza-Horizon-5-results-450x253.jpg 450w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Forza-Horizon-5-results-780x439.jpg 780w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Forza-Horizon-5-results-1600x900.jpg 1600w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Forza-Horizon-5-results.jpg 1920w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 768px) 100vw, 768px\" \/><\/a><figcaption>ONEXPLAYER 5800U Resultados do Forza Horizon 5<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<p>O <a href=\"https:\/\/droix.eu\/pt-pt\/product\/onexplayer-amd\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">ONEXPLAYER AMD<\/a> obt\u00e9m 53, 77 e 87 fotogramas por segundo nos tr\u00eas TDP. O <a href=\"https:\/\/droix.eu\/pt-pt\/product\/onexplayer-mini\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">ONEXPLAYER Mini<\/a> obt\u00e9m 51, 78 e 88 fotogramas por segundo. Estas pontua\u00e7\u00f5es s\u00e3o quase id\u00eanticas para ambas as consolas Windows e, se volt\u00e1ssemos a efetuar o teste, seria provavelmente 1 frame para cada uma delas.<\/p>\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-large is-resized\"><a href=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-and-AMD-5800U-Forza-Horizon-5.png\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-and-AMD-5800U-Forza-Horizon-5-1024x576.png\" alt=\"ONEXPLAYER Mini e AMD 5800U Forza Horizon 5\" class=\"wp-image-21386\" width=\"768\" height=\"432\" srcset=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-and-AMD-5800U-Forza-Horizon-5-1024x576.png 1024w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-and-AMD-5800U-Forza-Horizon-5-300x169.png 300w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-and-AMD-5800U-Forza-Horizon-5-768x432.png 768w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-and-AMD-5800U-Forza-Horizon-5-1536x864.png 1536w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-and-AMD-5800U-Forza-Horizon-5-450x253.png 450w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-and-AMD-5800U-Forza-Horizon-5-780x439.png 780w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-and-AMD-5800U-Forza-Horizon-5-1600x900.png 1600w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-and-AMD-5800U-Forza-Horizon-5.png 1920w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 768px) 100vw, 768px\" \/><\/a><figcaption>Compara\u00e7\u00e3o de Benchmark do Forza Horizon 5<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<p>Comparando as pontua\u00e7\u00f5es com outros port\u00e1teis para jogos Windows a 20W TDP, podemos ver que o AMD e o Mini levam a melhor sobre os modelos <a href=\"https:\/\/droix.eu\/pt-pt\/product\/ayaneo-next\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">AYA NEO NEXT<\/a> por alguns fotogramas. Tenha em aten\u00e7\u00e3o que os modelos AYA foram testados utilizando vers\u00f5es do Windows e controladores ligeiramente mais antigos, o que pode resultar numa ou duas diferen\u00e7as de fotogramas aqui ou ali.<\/p>\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-shadow-of-the-tomb-raider\">Shadow of the Tomb Raider<\/h3>\n\n<p>O pr\u00f3ximo na nossa lista de jogos \u00e9 Shadow of the Tomb Raider. Estamos a utilizar a resolu\u00e7\u00e3o de 1280&#215;800 com as defini\u00e7\u00f5es gr\u00e1ficas predefinidas mais baixas.<\/p>\n\n<p>No ONEXPLAYER AMD obtemos resultados de 40, 57 e 64 fotogramas por segundo, e no Mini obtemos 42, 55 e 59 fotogramas por segundo. H\u00e1 um pouco de varia\u00e7\u00e3o nas pontua\u00e7\u00f5es aqui, com as pontua\u00e7\u00f5es mais altas a alternarem entre os dois com TDPs diferentes.<\/p>\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-large is-resized\"><a href=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-and-AMD-5800U-Shadow-of-the-Tomb-Raider.png\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-and-AMD-5800U-Shadow-of-the-Tomb-Raider-1024x576.png\" alt=\"ONEXPLAYER Mini e AMD 5800U Shadow of the Tomb Raider\" class=\"wp-image-21391\" width=\"768\" height=\"432\" srcset=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-and-AMD-5800U-Shadow-of-the-Tomb-Raider-1024x576.png 1024w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-and-AMD-5800U-Shadow-of-the-Tomb-Raider-300x169.png 300w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-and-AMD-5800U-Shadow-of-the-Tomb-Raider-768x432.png 768w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-and-AMD-5800U-Shadow-of-the-Tomb-Raider-1536x864.png 1536w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-and-AMD-5800U-Shadow-of-the-Tomb-Raider-450x253.png 450w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-and-AMD-5800U-Shadow-of-the-Tomb-Raider-780x439.png 780w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-and-AMD-5800U-Shadow-of-the-Tomb-Raider-1600x900.png 1600w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-and-AMD-5800U-Shadow-of-the-Tomb-Raider.png 1920w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 768px) 100vw, 768px\" \/><\/a><figcaption>Compara\u00e7\u00e3o de Benchmarks de Shadow of the Tomb Raider<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<p>Nas nossas compara\u00e7\u00f5es, podemos ver que os modelos 5800U e 5825U est\u00e3o a aproximar-se do modelo ONEXPLAYER Mini Intel. N\u00e3o sabemos ao certo porque \u00e9 que o Mini teve uma pontua\u00e7\u00e3o mais baixa em 20 e 35W, s\u00f3 corremos cada benchmark uma vez para dar uma hip\u00f3tese justa.<\/p>\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-street-fighter-v\">Street Fighter V<\/h3>\n\n<p>No nosso teste de refer\u00eancia do Street Fighter V, verific\u00e1mos a taxa de fotogramas m\u00e9dia no final do primeiro jogo. Estamos a trabalhar com uma resolu\u00e7\u00e3o de 1280&#215;800 nas defini\u00e7\u00f5es gr\u00e1ficas m\u00e1ximas a 11, 20 e 35W TDP.<\/p>\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-large is-resized\"><a href=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Street-Fighter-V-results.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Street-Fighter-V-results-1024x576.jpg\" alt=\"Resultados do ONEXPLAYER 5800U Street Fighter V\" class=\"wp-image-21451\" width=\"768\" height=\"432\" srcset=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Street-Fighter-V-results-1024x576.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Street-Fighter-V-results-300x169.jpg 300w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Street-Fighter-V-results-768x432.jpg 768w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Street-Fighter-V-results-1536x864.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Street-Fighter-V-results-450x253.jpg 450w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Street-Fighter-V-results-780x439.jpg 780w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Street-Fighter-V-results-1600x900.jpg 1600w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Street-Fighter-V-results.jpg 1920w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 768px) 100vw, 768px\" \/><\/a><figcaption>Resultados do ONEXPLAYER 5800U Street Fighter V<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<p>O ONEXPLAYER AMD regista uma m\u00e9dia de 41,94, 55,35 e 58,88 fotogramas por segundo. O Mini obt\u00e9m 45,75, 56,35 e 58,91 FPS, respetivamente. Podemos ver uma diferen\u00e7a not\u00e1vel nas pontua\u00e7\u00f5es de 11W TDP, e quase nada em 20 e 35W TDP.<\/p>\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-large is-resized\"><a href=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-and-AMD-5800U-Street-Fighter-V.png\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-and-AMD-5800U-Street-Fighter-V-1024x576.png\" alt=\"ONEXPLAYER Mini e AMD 5800U Street Fighter V\" class=\"wp-image-21396\" width=\"768\" height=\"432\" srcset=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-and-AMD-5800U-Street-Fighter-V-1024x576.png 1024w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-and-AMD-5800U-Street-Fighter-V-300x169.png 300w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-and-AMD-5800U-Street-Fighter-V-768x432.png 768w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-and-AMD-5800U-Street-Fighter-V-1536x864.png 1536w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-and-AMD-5800U-Street-Fighter-V-450x253.png 450w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-and-AMD-5800U-Street-Fighter-V-780x439.png 780w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-and-AMD-5800U-Street-Fighter-V-1600x900.png 1600w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-and-AMD-5800U-Street-Fighter-V.png 1920w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 768px) 100vw, 768px\" \/><\/a><figcaption>Compara\u00e7\u00e3o de Benchmark de Street Fighter V<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<p>Na nossa compara\u00e7\u00e3o com dispositivos port\u00e1teis, podemos ver que nenhum dos dispositivos AMD consegue atingir o objetivo de 60 FPS. Mas est\u00e3o a aproximar-se com cada novo modelo. Em geral, as pontua\u00e7\u00f5es do 5800U s\u00e3o semelhantes a 20 e 35W TDP.<\/p>\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-final-fantasy-xiv\">Final Fantasy XIV<\/h3>\n\n<p>O nosso \u00faltimo jogo de refer\u00eancia \u00e9 o Final Fantasy XIV, que est\u00e1 a ser executado a 1280&#215;800 nas defini\u00e7\u00f5es gr\u00e1ficas m\u00e1ximas.<\/p>\n\n<p>O ONEXPLAYER AMD obt\u00e9m 4.005, 5.250 e 5.871 pontos nos tr\u00eas TDPs. O ONEXPAYER Mini obt\u00e9m 4,383, 5,359 e 5,930 pontos.<\/p>\n\n<p>Com um TDP de 11W, existe uma diferen\u00e7a bastante grande entre o AMD e o Mini. \u00c0 medida que a TDP aumenta, podemos ver as pontua\u00e7\u00f5es a equilibrarem-se.<\/p>\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-large is-resized\"><a href=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-and-AMD-5800U-Final-Fantasy-XIV-1024x576.png\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-and-AMD-5800U-Final-Fantasy-XIV-1024x576.png\" alt=\"ONEXPLAYER Mini e AMD 5800U Final Fantasy XIV\" class=\"wp-image-21401\" width=\"768\" height=\"432\" srcset=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-and-AMD-5800U-Final-Fantasy-XIV-1024x576.png 1024w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-and-AMD-5800U-Final-Fantasy-XIV-300x169.png 300w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-and-AMD-5800U-Final-Fantasy-XIV-768x432.png 768w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-and-AMD-5800U-Final-Fantasy-XIV-1536x864.png 1536w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-and-AMD-5800U-Final-Fantasy-XIV-450x253.png 450w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-and-AMD-5800U-Final-Fantasy-XIV-780x439.png 780w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-and-AMD-5800U-Final-Fantasy-XIV-1600x900.png 1600w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-Mini-and-AMD-5800U-Final-Fantasy-XIV.png 1920w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 768px) 100vw, 768px\" \/><\/a><figcaption>Compara\u00e7\u00e3o de Benchmark de Final Fantasy XIV<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<p>Na nossa compara\u00e7\u00e3o, podemos ver que os modelos 5800U e 5825U est\u00e3o praticamente ao mesmo n\u00edvel. Mas, mais uma vez, o Intel 1195G7 assume a lideran\u00e7a de longe com uma diferen\u00e7a de 27% na pontua\u00e7\u00e3o.<\/p>\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-benchmark-summary\">Resumo da refer\u00eancia<\/h2>\n\n<p>Um breve olhar sobre todas as pontua\u00e7\u00f5es de benchmark dos Jogos e compar\u00e1-las com outras port\u00e1teis baseadas em AMD e Intel com 20W TDP.<\/p>\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table><tbody><tr><td><\/td><td><strong>PCMARK<\/strong><\/td><td><strong>3DMARK<\/strong><\/td><td><strong>FORZA HORIZON 5<\/strong><\/td><td><strong>STREET FIGHTER V<\/strong><\/td><td><strong>FINAL FANTASY XIV<\/strong><\/td><td><strong>SHADOW OF THE TOMB RAIDER<\/strong><\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>AYA NEO NEXT PRO (5825U)<\/strong><\/td><td>5819<\/td><td>1455<\/td><td>78 FPS<\/td><td>56,39 FPS<\/td><td>5388<\/td><td> 58 FPS<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>AYA NEO NEXT ADV. (5800U)<\/strong><\/td><td>5733<\/td><td>1351<\/td><td>77 FPS<\/td><td>54,63 FPS<\/td><td>5282<\/td><td>57 FPS<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>AYA NEO 2021 (4500U)<\/strong><\/td><td>4894<\/td><td>1083<\/td><td>68 FPS<\/td><td>47,42 FPS<\/td><td>4649<\/td><td>50 FPS<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>AYA NEO 2021 PRO (4800U)<\/strong><\/td><td>5256<\/td><td>1329<\/td><td>73 FPS<\/td><td>51,51 FPS<\/td><td>5068<\/td><td>54 FPS<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong>ONEXPLAYER MINI (1195G7)<\/strong><\/td><td>5253<\/td><td>1123<\/td><td>68 FPS<\/td><td>60 FPS<\/td><td>5470<\/td><td>62 FPS<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong><strong>ONEXPLAYER<\/strong> MINI (5800U)<\/strong><\/td><td>5687<\/td><td>1366<\/td><td>78 FPS<\/td><td>56,53 FPS<\/td><td>5359<\/td><td>55 FPS<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><strong><strong>ONEXPLAYER<\/strong> AMD (5800U)<\/strong><\/td><td>5641<\/td><td>1304<\/td><td>77 FPS<\/td><td>55,35 FPS<\/td><td>5250<\/td><td>57 FPS<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><figcaption>Resultados dos testes de refer\u00eancia TDP de 20W<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n<p>O ONEXPLAYER AMD e o Mini saem-se bastante bem no geral com pontua\u00e7\u00f5es competitivas nos benchmarks de jogos. No entanto, os valores de refer\u00eancia do sistema s\u00e3o um pouco inferiores aos do modelo AYA NEO NEXT PRO. Trata-se provavelmente de uma diferen\u00e7a nas velocidades de RAM e de armazenamento utilizadas pelo AYA e pelo ONEXPLAYER.<\/p>\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Que consola port\u00e1til para jogos Windows devo comprar?<\/h2>\n\n<p>Qual dos modelos AMD e Mini da ONEXPLAYER \u00e9 a melhor consola de jogos port\u00e1til? Com a AMD, tem um dispositivo maior e um ecr\u00e3 maior com uma resolu\u00e7\u00e3o mais elevada. Sem esquecer as caracter\u00edsticas \u00fanicas, como o sensor de impress\u00f5es digitais e o suporte&#8230;  <\/p>\n\n<p>Mas o ONEXPLAYER Mini tem um ligeiro aumento geral de desempenho em compara\u00e7\u00e3o com o AMD. \u00c9 mais pequeno e mais f\u00e1cil de transportar. Pode n\u00e3o gostar de um ecr\u00e3 t\u00e3o grande numa consola port\u00e1til, ou talvez prefira uma resolu\u00e7\u00e3o nativa mais baixa para que os jogos corram mais depressa se a utilizar.<\/p>\n\n<p>Ambos s\u00e3o excelentes dispositivos port\u00e1teis por direito pr\u00f3prio, pelo que pode ser uma quest\u00e3o de prefer\u00eancia pessoal saber qual \u00e9 o mais adequado para si.  <\/p>\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-games-performance\">Desempenho dos jogos<\/h2>\n\n<p>Terminaremos a an\u00e1lise do ONEXPLAYER AMD &amp; Mini 5800U com uma breve an\u00e1lise de alguns jogos e imagens de emuladores que foram configurados para serem jog\u00e1veis, em vez de colocarmos tudo no m\u00e1ximo.<\/p>\n\n<p>Experiment\u00e1mos uma variedade de jogos e verific\u00e1mos que o desempenho \u00e9 praticamente igual ao do AYA NEO NEXT PRO. Est\u00e1vamos a utilizar Windows e controladores gr\u00e1ficos ligeiramente mais antigos, o que n\u00e3o deveria resultar numa grande diferen\u00e7a de desempenho.<\/p>\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"576\" src=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Elden-Ring-1024x576.jpg\" alt=\"ONEXPLAYER 5800U Anel Elden\" class=\"wp-image-21456\" srcset=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Elden-Ring-1024x576.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Elden-Ring-300x169.jpg 300w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Elden-Ring-768x432.jpg 768w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Elden-Ring-1536x864.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Elden-Ring-450x253.jpg 450w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Elden-Ring-780x439.jpg 780w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Elden-Ring-1600x900.jpg 1600w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Elden-Ring.jpg 1920w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n<p>Com Elden Ring, estamos a jogar a 1280&#215;800 com uma mistura de defini\u00e7\u00f5es gr\u00e1ficas baixas e m\u00e9dias e estamos a obter taxas de fotogramas muito jog\u00e1veis. Podes fixar a velocidade de fotogramas em 30 e aumentar um pouco as defini\u00e7\u00f5es gr\u00e1ficas.<\/p>\n\n<p>Com o Forza Horizon 5, estamos a correr a 1280&#215;800 com as defini\u00e7\u00f5es gr\u00e1ficas mais baixas. Sabemos, pelos testes de refer\u00eancia, que obtivemos bem mais de 60 fotogramas por segundo. A jogabilidade era super suave quando bloqueada a 60. Se quiseres, podes utilizar defini\u00e7\u00f5es gr\u00e1ficas mais elevadas.<\/p>\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-large is-resized\"><a href=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-LEGO-Star-Wars.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-LEGO-Star-Wars-1024x576.jpg\" alt=\"ONEXPLAYER 5800U LEGO Star Wars\" class=\"wp-image-21461\" width=\"768\" height=\"432\" srcset=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-LEGO-Star-Wars-1024x576.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-LEGO-Star-Wars-300x169.jpg 300w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-LEGO-Star-Wars-768x432.jpg 768w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-LEGO-Star-Wars-1536x864.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-LEGO-Star-Wars-450x253.jpg 450w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-LEGO-Star-Wars-780x439.jpg 780w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-LEGO-Star-Wars-1600x900.jpg 1600w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-LEGO-Star-Wars.jpg 1920w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 768px) 100vw, 768px\" \/><\/a><figcaption>ONEXPLAYER 5800U LEGO Star Wars<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<p>Quer\u00edamos experimentar o LEGO Star Wars Skywalker Saga na resolu\u00e7\u00e3o nativa do ONEXPLAYER AMD de 2560&#215;1600 e estamos a correr nas defini\u00e7\u00f5es M\u00e9dias. A jogabilidade \u00e9 \u00f3ptima, sem problemas, no LEGO Star Wars, mas em alguns outros jogos n\u00e3o se obt\u00e9m a mesma experi\u00eancia com a resolu\u00e7\u00e3o nativa.<\/p>\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-emulator-performance\">Desempenho do emulador<\/h2>\n\n<p>O desempenho da emula\u00e7\u00e3o est\u00e1 ao n\u00edvel do <a href=\"https:\/\/droix.eu\/pt-pt\/product\/ayaneo-next-pro\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">AYA NEO NEXT Pro<\/a> com 5825U e obtemos alguns bons resultados. Ambos os modelos s\u00e3o mais do que capazes de emular todas as consolas cl\u00e1ssicas de 8, 16 e 32 bits. Passando para as consolas mais recentes, temos um bom desempenho. Lembre-se de que os emuladores que mostramos ainda est\u00e3o em desenvolvimento ativo e podem n\u00e3o estar totalmente optimizados.<\/p>\n\n<p>A emula\u00e7\u00e3o da Xbox original est\u00e1 no ponto. Pode desfrutar de jogos compat\u00edveis a toda a velocidade e, normalmente, pode aumentar a resolu\u00e7\u00e3o de processamento para melhorar o aspeto visual.<\/p>\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-large is-resized\"><a href=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Xemu.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Xemu-1024x576.jpg\" alt=\"ONEXPLAYER 5800U Xemu Emulador Xbox\" class=\"wp-image-21466\" width=\"768\" height=\"432\" srcset=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Xemu-1024x576.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Xemu-300x169.jpg 300w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Xemu-768x432.jpg 768w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Xemu-1536x864.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Xemu-450x253.jpg 450w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Xemu-780x439.jpg 780w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Xemu-1600x900.jpg 1600w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Xemu.jpg 1920w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 768px) 100vw, 768px\" \/><\/a><figcaption>ONEXPLAYER 5800U Xemu Emulador Xbox<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<p>O emulador Citra tamb\u00e9m funciona muito bem. \u00c9 claro que pode alterar a visualiza\u00e7\u00e3o para mostrar um ecr\u00e3 numa vista maior ou em ecr\u00e3 inteiro, ou mostrar ambos, como estamos a fazer. N\u00e3o tivemos problemas de desempenho aqui.<\/p>\n\n<p>Para a PlayStation 2, o desempenho \u00e9 fant\u00e1stico. Pode desfrutar de jogos com resolu\u00e7\u00f5es de renderiza\u00e7\u00e3o mais elevadas e manter uma velocidade est\u00e1vel de 60 fotogramas por segundo. Os jogos t\u00eam realmente um aspeto fant\u00e1stico nos ecr\u00e3s do ONEXPLAYER.<\/p>\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-large is-resized\"><a href=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-RPCS3.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-RPCS3-1024x576.jpg\" alt=\"ONEXPLAYER 5800U PlayStation 3 RPCS3\" class=\"wp-image-21471\" width=\"768\" height=\"432\" srcset=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-RPCS3-1024x576.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-RPCS3-300x169.jpg 300w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-RPCS3-768x432.jpg 768w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-RPCS3-1536x864.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-RPCS3-450x253.jpg 450w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-RPCS3-780x439.jpg 780w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-RPCS3-1600x900.jpg 1600w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-RPCS3.jpg 1920w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 768px) 100vw, 768px\" \/><\/a><figcaption>ONEXPLAYER 5800U PlayStation 3 RPCS3<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<p>Para a emula\u00e7\u00e3o da PlayStation 3, como acontece com todas as consolas port\u00e1teis, h\u00e1 alguns problemas de desempenho. Pode depender do jogo que est\u00e1 a jogar, bem como da compatibilidade dos emuladores. Estamos a executar o WipeOut HD com 30 fotogramas por segundo bloqueados e funciona muito bem.<\/p>\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-large is-resized\"><a href=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Cruisin-Blast.png\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Cruisin-Blast-1024x576.png\" alt=\"ONEXPLAYER 5800U Ryujinx Cruisin Blast\" class=\"wp-image-21476\" width=\"768\" height=\"432\" srcset=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Cruisin-Blast-1024x576.png 1024w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Cruisin-Blast-300x169.png 300w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Cruisin-Blast-768x432.png 768w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Cruisin-Blast-1536x864.png 1536w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Cruisin-Blast-450x253.png 450w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Cruisin-Blast-780x439.png 780w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Cruisin-Blast-1600x900.png 1600w, https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/ONEXPLAYER-5800U-Cruisin-Blast.png 1920w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 768px) 100vw, 768px\" \/><\/a><figcaption>ONEXPLAYER 5800U Ryujinx Cruisi'n Blast<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<p>E terminamos a nossa an\u00e1lise do ONEXPLAYER AMD &amp; MINI 5800U com o emulador RyuJinx. Mais uma vez, este produto ainda se encontra em desenvolvimento ativo, pelo que o desempenho pode variar. Mas experiment\u00e1mos uma s\u00e9rie de jogos e estavam a correr \u00e0 velocidade m\u00e1xima ou, pelo menos, a velocidades jog\u00e1veis.<\/p>\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Onde comprar o ONEXPLAYER AMD e Mini 5800U?<\/h2>\n\n<p>Esta \u00e9 a nossa an\u00e1lise dos modelos ONEXPLAYER AMD e Mini, esperamos que tenha sido \u00fatil. Pode saber mais e <a href=\"https:\/\/droix.eu\/pt-pt\/product\/onexplayer-amd\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">comprar o ONEXPLAYER AMD 5800U aqui<\/a>, e comprar o <a href=\"https:\/\/droix.eu\/pt-pt\/product\/onexplayer-mini\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">ONEXPLAYER Mini 5800U aqui<\/a>. Pode consultar a nossa gama de <a href=\"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/product-category\/handhelds\/handheld-game-consoles\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">consolas de jogos port\u00e1teis aqui<\/a>,<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Na nossa an\u00e1lise do ONEXPLAYER AMD &amp; MINI 5800U, comparamos o desempenho de ambos com alguns testes de sistema, jogos e emuladores.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":859,"featured_media":60308,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[770],"tags":[987,977,1561],"class_list":{"0":"post-73905","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-sem-categoria","8":"tag-dispositivos-portateis-para-jogos-pt-pt","9":"tag-jogos-pt-pt","10":"tag-onexplayer-pt-pt"},"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/73905","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/859"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=73905"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/73905\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/60308"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=73905"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=73905"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/droix.net\/blogs\/pt-pt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=73905"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}